Korean J Intern Med > Volume 15(1); 2000 > Article
Han, Kwon, Jo, Shin, Cha, Cho, Pyo, and Kim: ACE Gene Polymorphism and renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitors in IgA nephropathy patients

Abstract

We examined the renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitor in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) patients according to the grouping of ACE gene polymorphism. Sixty one patients diagnosed as IgAN by renal biopsy and prescribed with ACE inhibitors were enrolled. Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood and PCR was performed. The I/D polymorphism was determined by the presence of the 287 bp fragment in intron 16 of chromosome 17. During the follow-up period (mean; 44.6 months, median: 44.5 months, 5 to 113 months), the blood pressure of 61 patients was controlled below 130/80 mmHg. The renal responsiveness was determined by the degree of changes of proteinuria at 12 months after initiation of ACE inhibitors and by the slope of reciprocal variation of the serum creatinine against follow-up duration {(1/Cr2-1/Cr1)/durations}. The distribution of the II, ID and DD genotype among 61 patients was 21, 16 and 24 patients, respectively. There were no differences among three genotypes in age, sex, the number of patients with initial blood pressure over 140/90 mmHg, initial serum creatinine level, the number of patients with initial azotemia(> 1.4mg/dL) and with initial 24-hr proteinuria amount over 2.0 g. Significant anti-proteinuric effect of ACE inhibitor was found in IgAN(p =0.001), but no significant difference was found among genotypes. Significant difference (p =0.011) was noticed between II type and DD type in the slope of reciprocal variation of the serum creatinine against follow-up duration. In conclusion, efficacy of ACE inhibitors on renal function preservation in IgAN was more pronounced in DD genotype than II genotype.

INTRODUCTION

IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most common glomerulonephritis in the world, is known to progress insidiously to end-stage renal disease in 30% to 35% of patients within 20 to 30 years1,2). To ameliorate the progression, many therapies have been tried but none has shown sufficient promise. Among them, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are believed effective in attenuating the progressive deterioration of renal function. However, the therapeutic benefit of ACE inhibition varies among IgAN patients3).
Recently, three types of ACE gene were identified by the presence (I allele) or absence (D allele) of a 287 bp repeated sequence in intron 16 of ACE gene, and the D allele was known to be associated with higher plasma ACE activity4,5). It was hypothesized that the ACE genotype might be a determinant of the renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitors. However, the studies on the relationship between ACE I/D genotype and renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitors were conflicting and studies were and conducted on the short-term observation6).
The aims of this study were to examine the baseline characteristics of each ACE genotype in biopsy-proven IgAN patients, and to evaluate the renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitors in IgAN patients during relatively long periods according to ACE genotype.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Materials

We retrospectively studied 61 biopsy-proven IgAN patients (31 men and 30 women, mean 36.3 ± 11 years, 16 to 62 years of age) with blood pressure over 130/80 mmHg or 24hr proteinuria over 1 g/day at Korea University Hospital from January 1990 through December 1997. End point of the study was the start of dialysis or March 1998, and the mean follow-up duration was 44.6 ± 26.8 months (median 44.5 months, range 5 to 113 months). All 61 patients were prescribed with ACE inhibitors (captopril and enalapril) when renal biopsy was done. Blood pressure measurements were taken using standard mercury sphygmomanometers at monthly visits and controlled below 130 / 80 mmHg during the follow-up period. Controls (N=120, 62 men and 58 female, age 46.9 years range: 16 to 62 years) were chosen from healthy volunteers with normal blood pressure, BUN, serum creatinine and urinanalysis.

2. Methods

We obtained information on sex, age, duration of disease, hypertension (> 140/90mmHg), proteinuria (initial and follow-up) serum creatinine (initial and follow-up), and azotemia (initial and follow up: serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL). “Initial” means before prescription of ACE inhibitors and “follow-up” means the end point of study after prescription of ACE inhibitors. The renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitors was determined by the degree of changes of proteinuria at 12 months after prescription of ACE inhibitors and by the slope of reciprocal variation of the serum creatinine during follow-up duration {(1/Cr2 - 1/Cr1)/durations}.
To determine ACE genotype, we obtained venous blood samples and extracted genomic DNA from leukocytes in buffy coat using QIAamp Blood Kit (Qiagen, Germany). A 287-bp I/D polymorphism in the intron 16 of the ACE gene was examined by polymerase chain reaction(PCR). The sequences of the sense and antisense primers were 5′-CTG GAG ACC ACT CTT TCT-3′ and 5′-GAT GTG GCC ATC ACA TTC GTC AGA-3′, respectively (Genosys DNA synthesizer, USA). PCR was performed in a final volume of 50 μL that contained 50 ng of genomic DNA, 40 pmol of each primer, 125 μmol each of the four dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 50 mmol KCl, 10 mmol Tris-HCl (pH 8.3) and 1 U of Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). Amplification was carried out for 30 cycles with steps of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 54°C for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels. Amplication of the D allele resulted in a 190 bp DNA fragment and amplification of the I allele resulted in a 490 bp fragment. Homozygotes had a single 190 (DD) or 490 (ID) bp band; heterozygotes had one 190 bp and one 490 bp band.
To verify DD genotype, the PCR products of all DD genotypes were examined by 2nd PCR. The sequences of the sense and antisense primers from insertion specific sequence were 5′-TGG GAC CAC AGC GCC CGC TAC-3′ and 5′-TCG CCA CTC CCA TGC CCA TAA-3′, respectively (Genosys DNA synthesizer, USA). PCR was performed in a final volume of 50 μL that contained 50 ng of genomic DNA, 40 pmol of each primer, 125 μmol each of the four dNTP, 3 mM MgCl2, 50 mmol KCl, 10 mmol Tris-HCl (pH 8.3) and 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). Amplification was carried out for 30 cycles with steps of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 67°C for 45 sec and extension at 72°C for 2 min. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels. Random replication of PCR amplification was used to verify all of the results.
First, we examined the baseline characteristics according to genotype. Second, we evaluated the renal responsiveness to ACE inhibitors, and compared the above variables among three genotypes.

3. Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± S.D. Statistical analysis was done by student’s t-test, χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test and ANOVA analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The distribution of II, ID and DD genotypes in controls was 25, 63 and 32, respectively.
Out of 61 patients, the distribution of the II, ID and DD genotypes was 21, 16 and 24 patients, respectively. There were no differences among the three genotypes in baseline characteristics such as sex, age, initial serum creatinine level and initial 24-hrs proteinuria, and the number of patients whose initial blood pressure were over 140/90 mmHg, initial serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl, and initial proteinuria > 2.0g/day (Table 1).
Mean follow-up duration of each genotype was II genotype, 36.6 ± 22.9 months (median 30.0 months, range 6 to 79 months), ID genotype, 49.3 ± 31.2 months (median 43.0 months, range 5 to 113 months), and DD genotype, 48.1 ± 26.3 months (median 48.5 months, range 10 to 108 months) (Table 1).
There were no differences among the three genotypes in the follow-up serum creatinine level and the number of patients with development of azotemia(follow-up serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl) during follow-up periods (Table 1). However, significant changes were noticed in the slopes of reciprocal variation of the serum creatinine against follow up duration {(1/Cr2-1/Cr1/durations} (Fig. 1). The mean slopes according to three genotypes were −0.0059 ± 0.0130 dℓ *mg−1*month−1 in II, 0.0038 ± 0.0109 dℓ*mg−1*month−1 in ID, and 0.0187 ± 0.0008 dℓ*mg−1*month−1in DD (Table 1). A significant difference was noticed between II and DD genotype (p= 0.05). However no significant differences were shown between ID and DD genotype (p= 0.23), and between II and ID genotype (p= 0.83). Therefore, ACE inhibitors in DD genotype of IgAN were more effective than in II genotype and ID genotype in attenuating the progression of renal disease.
There were no significant differences among three genotypes in the patients with initial proeinuria over 2.0 g/day(Table 1) and over 3.5 g/day (II: 8, ID: 5, DD: 9). Also, there were no significant differences among three genotypes in the degree of changes of proteinuria at 12 months after ACE inhibitor prescription. However, antiproteinuric responsiveness to ACE inhibitors at 12 months after prescription was noticed significantly in most of the IgAN patients regardless of genotypes (initial 3549.1 ± 3259 mg, median: 3000 mg; after 12 months 1672.9 ± 1879 mg, median: 985 mg; p < 0.001, Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

We showed that ACE inhibitors’ efficacy on renal function preservation in IgAN was more pronounced in DD genotype than II genotype when we compared the slopes of reciprocal variation of the serum creatinine against follow-up duration. Also, the significant antiproteinuric response to ACE inhibitors was found in IgAN, but no significant difference was found among three ACE genotypes.
Because of the relatively long observation period (mean 44.6, median 44.5 months, range 5 to 113 months) of this study, we expected that the long-term renal protective effects of ACE inhibitors in IgAN would be variable according to ACE gene polymorphism. However, with regard to the antiproteinuric responsiveness, we could not find a significant difference among the three genotypes. This suggests that other mechanisms by ACE inhibitor besides antiproteinuric effect may contribute in preserving the renal function in IgAN.
It has been reported that the distribution of ACE genotypes in IgAN is similar to that in the general population7,8,9). The association between DD genotype and the renal disease progression was controversial. Some reported that the genotypes with D allele were not related to the progression of glomerulonephritis including IgAN9,10). On the other hand, others reported the progression of IgAN may be influenced by the genotypes with D allele8,11,12). Dissimilar to the above studies which observed the natural course of IgAN, we observed the course of IgAN after therapeutic intervention with ACE inhibitors.
ACE plays a key enzyme in the renin-angiotensin and kallikrein-kinin system by activating angiotensin I into angiotensin II and by inactivating bradykinin13,14,15). The renin-angiotensin system is believed to play an important pathophysiologic role in the progression of chronic renal disease. ACE inhibitors have been reported to attenuate the progression of chronic renal disease such as primary glomerulonephritis or diabetic nephropathy16,17,18).
An ACE gene polymorphism has been known as an important genetic factor influencing the plasma and cellular ACE levels; ACE activity is known to be higher in the order of DD, ID, II4,5). Therefore, activities of local angiotensin II and bradykinin may be related to ACE gene polymorphism. Probably because II genotype was associated with lower angiotensin II level in the kidney than DD genotype, ACE inhibition in II genotype may be less efficient on renal function preservation compared with that in DD genotype11). We also found that ACE inhibitors were more efficient in DD genotype in preserving renal function in IgAN when comparing the slope of creatinine variation against follow-up duration. In comparison to other studies, we observed relatively longer periods(median 44.5 months, range 5 to 113 months). We observed the course of six IgA patients for less than one year; the distribution of II, ID and DD genotypes was 3, 1, 2, respectively. However, because of small sample size, a future large-scale study should be done to generalize and confirm our positive findings.
Antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors was firstly reported by de Jong et al19). Some reported ACE inhibitors were more effective in antiproteinuric effect than any other antihypertensive drugs20,21). Also, some reported antiproteinuric effects of ACE inhibitors were more pronounced in DD genotype than II or ID genotype of IgAN patients at 1 year after prescription of ACE inhibitors6,11,12). However, we found that antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibitors in IgAN was not different among the three genotypes. This discrepancy may be related to the small sample size of this study and the abrupt antiproteinuric response to ACE inhibitors in a few patients with II and ID genotype.
Antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition is now widely accepted through the hemodynamic effect of ACE inhibitor besides reducing systemic blood pressure. These changes in renal hemodynamics are mostly likely due to the reduced local angitensin II formation and the augmented local bradykinin formation in the kidney, which elicit decreased efferent arteriolar resistance and subsequent fall in intraglomerular pressure15,19).
Another mechanism, besides antiproteinuric effect may be present in renal function preservation of IgAN by ACE inhibition. Angiotensin II may act as a growth factor on several renal cells, including mesangial cells and tubular epithelial cells, besides constricting action on vascular smooth muscle cells22,23). Angiotensin II has been known to promote the growth changes and the synthesis of extracellular matrix protein through stimulating the release of transforming growth factor-β (TGF- β)24,25). Therefore angiotensin II is regarded as having a pathophysiologic role in renal disease progression.
In conclusion, our results suggest that ACE inhibitors’ efficacy on antiproteinuric action is significant in IgAN, and that ACE inhibitors’ efficacy on renal function preservation in IgAN is more pronounced in DD genotype than II genotype.

Fig. 1.
Slopes of creatinine variation against follow-up duration in each patient with IgA nephropathy according to ACE genotype, (slope: dℓ*mg −1*month−1)(bar: mean ± SD)
kjim-15-1-13-3f1.gif
Fig. 2.
Changes of 24-hr proteinuria amount in each patient according to ACE genotypes (I: Initial, 1 yr: 1 year after ACE inhibitor treatment)
kjim-15-1-13-3f2.gif
Table 1.
The baseline and follow-up characteristics across the three genotypes in patients with IgA nephropathy.
II ID DD
Number(M/F) 21(12/9) 16(5/11) 24(15/9)
Age(yrs) 33.4(±8.9) 38.0(± 12.2) 38.0(± 11.9)
Initial s-Cr(mg/dL) 1.13(± 0.59) 0.91(± 0.25) 1.13(± 0.83)
Initial s-Cr> 1.4mg/dl 3 1 3
Follow-up s-Cr(mg/dL) 1.64(± 1.76) 1.50(± 2.46) 1.60(± 2.17)
Follow-up s-Cr> 1.4mg/dL 4 2 4
Slope of 1/Cr* −0.0059 ± 0.013 −0.0038 ± 0.011 0.0018 ± 0.0083
Initial BP> 140/90mmHg 7 6 6
Initial proteinuria>2g/day 14 8 12
Follow-up duration(Mo) 36.6(± 22.9) 49.3(± 31.2) 48.1(± 26.3)

Values are given as means ± SD.

* Data were compared among II, ID and DD by one-way ANOVA. In the slope of 1/Cr, there was significant difference (p =0.05) beween II and DD. In other variables, no significant differences were noted among three genotypes.

REFERENCES

1. D’ Amico G. The commonest glomerulonephritis in the world. IgA nephrophathy. Q J Med 1987;245:709–727.

2. Giuseppe D’Amico. Influence of clinical and histological features on actual renal survival in adult patients with idiopathic IgA nephropathy, membranous nephropathy and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: survey of the recent literature. Am J Kidney dis 1992;20:315–323.
pmid
3. Heeg JE, de Jong PE, van der Hem GK, de Zeeuw D. Efficacy and variability of the antiproteinuric effect of ACE inhibition by lisinopril. Kidney Int 1989;36:272–279.
crossref pmid
4. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme level. J Clin Invest 1990;86:1343–1346.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Tiret L, Rigat B, Visvikise S. BredaC. CorvolP. CambienF. SoubrierF. Evidence from combined segregation and linkage analysis that a variant of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) gene controls plasma ACE level. Am J Hum Genet 1992;51:197–205.
pmid pmc
6. Moriyama T, Kitamura H, Ochi S, Izumi M, Yokoyama K, Yamaguchi A, Ueda N, Kamada T, Imai E. Association of angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism with susceptibility to antiprotenuric effect of angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor in patients with proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995;6:1674–1678.

7. Kim W, Choi KH, Park SK, Kang SK, Kwon JK, Park SB, Kim HC, Lee KY. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in IgA nephropathy (abstract). Korea J Int Med 1997;Oct. S27.

8. Yorioka T, Suchiro T, Yasuoka N, Hashimoto K, Kawada M. Polymorphism of the angiontensin-converting enzyme gene and clinical aspects of IgA nephropathy. Clini Neprol 1995;44:80–85.

9. Schmidt S, Stier E, Hartung R, Stein G, Bahnish J, Woodroffe A, Clarkson A, Ponticelli C, Campise M, Mayer G, Ganten D, Ritz E. No association of converting enzyme Insertion/Deletion polymorphism with immunoglobulin A Glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;26:727–731.
crossref pmid
10. Schmidt A, Kiener HP, Barnas U, Arias I, Illievich A, Auinger M, Graninger W, Kaider A, Mayer G. Angiotensin-converting enzyme polymorphism in patients with terminal renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996;7:314–317.
crossref pmid
11. Yoshida H, Kawamura T, Mitarai T, Kanai T, Ogura M, Kawamoto S, Kitajima T, Omura K, Abe A, Hamaguchi A, Eto T, Nagasawa R, Kubo H, Kawaguchi Y, Ichikawa I, Sakai O. Role of the deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene in IgA nephropathy (abstract). J Am Soc Nephrol 1994;5:846.

12. Yoshida H, Mitarai T, Kawamura T, Kitajima T, Miyazaki Y, Nagasawa R, Kawaguchi Y, Kubo H, Ichikawa I, Sakai O. Role of the deletion polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene in the progression and therapeutic responsiveness of IgA nephropathy. J Clin Invest 1995;96:2162–2169.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Hajj-Ali AF, Zimmerman BG. Kinin contribution to renal vasodilator effect of captopril in rabbit. Hypertension 1991;17:504–509.
crossref pmid
14. Kon V, Fogo A, Ichikawa I. Bradykinin causes selective efferent arteriolar dilation during angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibition. Kidney Int 1993;44:545–550.
crossref pmid
15. Ritz E, Orth S, Weinreich T, Jurgen W. Systemic hypertension versus intraglomerular hypertension in progression. Kidney Int 1994;45:438–442.
crossref pmid
16. Giatras Ioannis, Lau Joseph, Levey Andrew S. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:337–345.
crossref pmid
17. Gansevoort RT, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. Long-term benefits of antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in nondiabetic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1993;22:202–206.
crossref pmid
18. Jacobsen P, Rossing K, Rossing P, Tamow L, Mallet C, Poirier O, Cambien F, Parving H-H. Angiotensin- converting enzyme gene polymorphism and ACE inhibition in diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 1998;53:1002–1006.
crossref pmid
19. de Jong PE, Anderson S, de Zeeuw D. Glomerular preload and afterload reduction as a tool to lower urinary protein leakage: Will such treatments also help to improve renal function outcome? J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;3:1333–1341.
pmid
20. Cattran DC, Greenwood C, Ritchie S. Long-term benefits of angiontensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in patients with severe IgA nephropathy: A comparison to patients receiving treatment with other antihypertensive agents and to patients receiving no therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 1994;23:247–257.
crossref pmid
21. Rekola S, Bergstrand A, Bucht H. Deterioration rate in hypertensive IgA nephropathy: Comparison of a converting enzyme inhibitor and β-blocking agents. Nephron 1991;59:57–60.
crossref pmid
22. Yoshida H, Kon V, Ichikawa I. Polymorphism of the renin-angiotensin system genes in progressive renal diseases. Kidney Int 1996;50:732–744.
crossref pmid
23. Wolf G, Neilson EG. Angiotensin II as a renal growth factor. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993;3:1531–1540.
crossref pmid
24. Kagami S, Border WA, Miller DE, Noble NA. Angiotensin II stimulates matrix protein syntheis through induction of transforming growth factor-β expression in rat glomerular mesangial cells. J Clin Invest 1994;93:2431–2437.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Wolf G, Mueller E, Stahl RA, Ziyadeh FN. Angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy of cultured murine proximal tubular cells is mediated by endogenous transforming growth factor-β. J Clin Invest 1993;92:1366–1372.
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 6 Crossref
  • 13 Scopus
  • 9,883 View
  • 76 Download
Related articles

Editorial Office
101-2501, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2271-6792    Fax: +82-2-790-0993    E-mail: kaim@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Internal Medicine.

Close layer
prev next