A Less Intensive Combination of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients who Have Aged 60 Years or More and Has a Poor Performance Status

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2004;19(2):109-113

doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2004.19.2.109

Young Joo Min, M.D., Jong Joon Ahn, M.D., Young Ju Noh, M.D.^*, Hee Jeong Cha, M.D.^†, Jae Hee Suh, M.D.^†, Jong Pil Jung, M.D.^‡, Chang Ryul Park, M.D.^‡, Ae Kyung Jeong, M.D.^#, Jae Hoo Park, M.D., Ki Man Lee, M.D.^§^,

^*Departments of Internal Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea

^†Departments of Internal Medicine, Pathology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea

^‡Departments of Internal Medicine, Thoracic Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea

^#Departments of Internal Medicine, Radiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea

^§Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Medical School, Cheongju Korea

Correspondence to: Ki Man Lee, M.D., Department of Internal medicine, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, 62 Gaesin-dong, Hungduk-ku, Cheongju, Chungbuk, 360-763, Korea, Tel: 82-43-269-6353, Fax: 82-43-273-3252, E-mail: kimlee@chungbuk.ac.kr

Received 2003 December 29; Accepted 2004 February 13.

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the response, survival, and toxicities of a less intensive combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin, which is used in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients older than 60 years of age including those with a poor performance status.

Methods

Thirty patients received 135 mg/m² of paclitaxel on day 1, and carboplatin was administered to the patients on day 1 every 4 weeks over an area under the concentration-time curve of 6.

Results

The response rate was 40%, the median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 14 months), and the 1 year survival rate was 31%. The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 12.2 months). In addition, the toxicities were generally mild and reversible.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a less intensive combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin is active and well tolerated in advanced NSCLC patients who are older than 60 years including those with a poor PS 3–4.

Keywords: Non-small Cell lung Cancer; Elderly; Paclitaxel; Carboplatin

INTRODUCTION

According to the reports of the Korea National Statistical Office, it has been estimated that 25 out of 100,000 deaths are due to lung cancer in Korea, which makes it the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the year 2001. Aging is associated with an increased incidence of lung cancer, and the peak incidence occurs between the ages of 60–65. In Korea, approximately 65% of patients are 60 years of age or older^{1, 2)}. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung tumors, and more than 80% of the NSCLC patients were found to be in the advanced stage III and stage IV¹⁾. In patients with stage III NSCLC, chemotherapy in combination with thoracic radiation is the standard procedure of care. Unfortunately, there are subsets of patients with stage III NSCLC in whom the combined therapeutic modalities are unsuitable, such as patients with a malignant pleural effusion or a poor performance status (PS). These patients are generally grouped with the stage IV patients when systemic chemotherapy is considered.

Since 1990, the standard chemotherapy for patients with an unresectable disease and a good PS (ECOG level 0 or 1) consisted of cisplatin or carboplatin combined with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and docetaxel^3–5). Several trials have reported that the paclitaxel and carboplatin combination was well tolerated, and the combination was more convenient for these patients and was not significantly inferior to the other regimens^{5, 6)}.

However, there are questions that persist regarding the use of ‘standard’ regimens for patients who are elderly and have a poor PS, Therefore, this study was performed to evaluate the response, survival, and toxicities of a less intensive combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin in these advanced NSCLC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 2001 and February 2003, thirty patients from Ulsan University Hospital were enrolled in this study.

1. Eligibility criteria

Chemotherapy-naïve patients≥60 years of age were eligible if they had a histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced (IIIB) or metastatic (IV) NSCLC. No prior chemotherapy or thoracic radiotherapy was permitted. The subjects were required to have adequate bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count≥1,500/mm³, platelet count≥100,000/mm³), adequate hepatic function (bilirubin level two times the upper limit of the normal, AST and/or ALT<three times the upper limit of normal) and an adequate renal function (creatinine<1.5 mg/dL) Brain metastasis, if asymptomatic, was not considered as an exclusion criteria. Also, all the patients provided an informed consent.

2. Treatment Schedule

135 mg of paclitaxel per square meter of body-surface area was administered over a one hour infusion, which was followed by the administration of carboplatin on day 1 of a four-week cycle at a dose calculated to produce an area under the concentration-time curve of 6.0 mg per milliliter per minute. The doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were reduced by 25% for all other grade 3 toxicities (except alopecia) and were omitted entirely for any grade 4 toxicities.

3. Pretreatment and follow-up studies

Prior to participating in the study, all patients were required to have a complete physical examination, chest X-ray, chest computed tomographic scan, complete blood counts (CBC), biochemical tests, and an ECG. The physical examination, chest X-rays, CBC, biochemical tests were performed on each patient before each cycle and 14 days after each cycle of therapy.

4. Response and Toxicity Evaluation

The patients who received at least two treatment cycles were assessed for their response unless they showed definitive evidence of progression after the first cycle. Patients who had received at least one treatment cycle were assessed for toxicity. The responses were graded according to the RECIST criteria⁷⁾. Complete remission (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all the known lesions, no emergence of new lesions, and normalization of the tumor markers for at least 4 weeks. Partial remission (PR) was characterized by a 30% or greater decrease of the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions from the baseline, having a non-progressive disease in the non-target lesion, and no emergence of new lesions. The definition of progressive disease (PD) was to have at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. Stable disease (SD) was defined as an insufficient decrease in the tumor size to qualify for PR or an insufficient increase in size to qualify for PD. The toxicity grading was performed in accordance with the WHO toxicity criteria.

5. Statistical Methods

The categorical data were compared using the Fisher’s exact test. The survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier methods and were compared using the log-rank test. The analysis was performed using the SPSS 8.0 system (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL). A p value≤0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 68 years old (range, 61–83). Fourteen patients had stage IIIB disease, and 16 patients were diagnosed with stage IV disease. The majority of patients (53%) had PS (ECOG≥2). All the patients received at least one cycle of chemotherapy and were assessed for toxicity, and 26 received at least two cycles of therapy and were assessed for the type of their response.

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics

1. Treatment, response and survival

The treatment administration is summarized in Table 2. A total of 104 cycles were administered. The median number of cycles per patient was 3 (range, 1–6). The relative dose-intensity of both paclitaxel and carboplatin was 0.97. A total of 4 patients (13%) were considered to be non-assessable for response: 3 because of voluntary withdrawal, and one because of nausea and vomiting from toxicity after the first course of chemotherapy. Therefore, a total of 26 patients (87%) were assessed for their response.

Table 2.

Treatment Administration

The response rate was 40% (Table 3). There were no cases of CR’s, and 17% of patients showed the condition of SD and 30% illustrated PD. There was no significant difference between patients with a PS≤2 and patients with a PS≥3 in terms of the response rate (36% vs 50%, p=0.68). Also, these various comparisons illustrate that the response rates were not affected: patients with stage IIIB vs patients with stage IV disease (36% vs 44% p=0.72), patients aged<70 years vs those that have aged≥70 years (42% vs 31%, p=1.00), and histologic type of adenocarcinoma vs histologic type of non-adenocarcinoma (30% vs 45%, p=0.69).

Table 3.

Objective Response

The median overall survival was 9.1 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 14 months), and in all patients, the 1 year survival rate was 31% (Figure 1). Patients with a PS of 1 or 2 had a significantly better survival outcome than patients with a PS of 3 or 4 (1-year survival rate: 40% vs 0%, p=0.02) (Figure 2A, Table 4). However, age, stage, and histological subtype did not affect the overall survival (Figure 2B, Table 4). The median progression-free survival was 7.7 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 12.2 months) (Figure 3). PS, age, stage, and histological subtype did not show any significant differences in terms of the progression-free survival.

Figure 1.

Overall Survival

Figure 2A.

Effect of Performance status on Overall Survival

Table 4.

Effect of Prognostic Factors on Overall Survival

Figure 2B.

Effect of Staging on Overall Survival

2. Toxicities

The hematological and nonhematological toxicities were evaluated for all the patients, and the results are shown in Table 5. The treatment was generally well tolerated, and hematological toxicities were mild. Grade 3 neutropenia appeared in 23% of patients. There was neither grade 3/4 anemia nor grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Nonhematological toxicities were also mild. However, nausea and vomiting occurred frequently (47%) with the grade 3 toxicity occurring in 7% of patients. Alopecia was the most frequent symptom in 37% of patients who had grade 3 toxicity. Peripheral neuropathy and increased transaminase appeared (37%, 30% respectively) without any grade 3 toxicity.

Table 5.

Toxic Effects

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated a similar efficacy and a low toxicity of the less intensive combination of paclitaxel/carboplatin inadvanced NSCLC patients older than 60 years of age including those with a poor PS of 3–4. The treatment regimen consisted of paclitaxel 135 mg/m² by a 1 hour infusion followed by carboplatin at an AUC=6 in a 4 week cycle. The standard regimen for treating advanced NSCLC consists of paclitaxel 175–225 mg/m² plus carboplatin at an AUC= 6 every 3 weeks, and thus, it is considered more intensive than the regimen under study^{8, 9)}. All patients in the two trials had a PS of 0–2. The response rates in these studies were 31.8% and 29%, respectively. The two trials reported median survival times of 9.5 and 9.0 months, and the 1-year survival rates were 37% and 35%, respectively.

However, grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 56% of patients, 14% of whom had a neutropenic fever⁹⁾. On the other hand, this study included 8 patients (26%) with a PS of 3–4. The response rate was 40%, the median overall survival was 9.1 months, and the 1 year survival rate was 31%. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in only 23% of patients. Encouraging results and a favorable toxicity profile was demonstrated, even though this study included elderly patients with a poor PS.

Some clinical factors, such as age and PS, appear to influence the survival in NSCLC patients. Because a large percentage of NSCLC patients are elderly, there have been indications of doubt on whether the use of standard regimens, which are fairly intensive, for the elderly and poor PS patients are effective. Some studies have suggested that elderly patients with advanced NSCLC have poor outcomes^{10, 11)}. However, other studies have failed to confirm this or on the flip side, have suggested that older patients have a similar or even superior survival rate^12–14). Therefore, it is difficult to say that age is a reliable prognostic factor for these patients. This study also showed no significant differences between those patients < 70 years of age and those = 70 years of age in terms of the response rate and survival. Age was not the only factor considered because PS is generally regarded to be a powerful prognostic factor^10–14). In this study, the 1-year survival rate was 40% for the patients with a PS of 1–2, and 0% for the patients with a PS of 3–4 (p=0.02). Toxicity is particularly problematic in patients with a poor PS. Such patients were likely to be more susceptible to adverse events than the patients with a PS of 0 or 1, including adverse events such as death within 30 days from any cause. Since the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer is supportive and palliative at best, the routine use of platinum-based combination chemotherapy in patients with a poor PS cannot be recommended⁵⁾.

In conclusion, a less intensive combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin was effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients who were older than 60 years of age and had poor PS.

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Geum Suk Kim, a research nurse, for her assistance in data collection.

References

1. Lee CT. Epidemiology of lung cancer in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 34:3–5. 2002;

2. Shin HR, Ahn YO, Bae JM, Shin MH, Lee DH, Lee CW, Ohrr H, Ahn DH, Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Oh DK, Park JG. Cancer incidence in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 34:405–408. 2002;

3. le Chevalier T, Brisgand D, Douillard JY, Pujol JL, Alberola V, Monnier A, Riviere A, Lianes P, Chomy P, Cigolari S, Gottfried M, Ruffie P, Panizo A, Gaspard MH, Ravaioli A, Besenval M, Besson F, Martinez A, Berthaud P, Tursz T. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin versus vindesine and cisplatin versus vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a European multicenter trial including 612 patients. J Clin Oncol 12:360–367. 1994;

4. Bonomi P, Kim K, Fairclough D, Cella D, Kugler J, Rowinsky E, Jiroutek M, Johnson D. Comparison of survival and quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel combined with cisplatin versus etoposide with cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 18:623–631. 2000;

5. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, Langer C, Sandler A, Krook J, Zhu J, Johnson DH. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92–98. 2002;

6. Gatzemeier U, Rusell R, Betticher D, Keppler U, Macha HN, Pirker R, Berthet P, Breau JL, Bogaerts J, Gallant G. Randomised pan-European trial comparing paclitaxel (TAX)/carboplatin (CAR) versus paclitaxel/cisplatin (CIS) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eur J Cancer 35(suppl 4):246. 1999;

7. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, van Glabbeke MV, van Oosterom TA, Christian MC, Gwyther SG. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216. 2000;

8. Kosmidis P, Mylonakis N, Skarlos D, Samantas E, Dimopoulos M, Papadimitriou C, Kalophonos C, Pavlidis N, Nikolaidis C, Papa-constantinou C, Fountzilas G. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (6 AUC) versus paclitaxel (225 mg/m²) plus carboplatin (6 AUC) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 11:799–805. 2000;

9. Glorieux P, Ortmanns P, van den Bulcke J, Dewispelaere B, Petrick M, Canon J, Degives R, Degraeve D, Janssens E, van Hulle J, Grauwels D, Schallier D. Multi-center study with paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:533a. 2000;

10. Klastersky J, Soulier JP, Bureau G, Libert P, Ravez P, Vandermoten G, Thiriaux J, Lecomte J, Cordier R, Dabouis G, Brohee D, Themelin L, Mommen P. Cisplatin vs cisplatin plus etoposide in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 7:1087–1092. 1989;

11. Albain KS, Crowley JJ, LeBlanc M, Livingston RB. Survival determinants in extensive-stage non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 9:1618–1626. 1991;

12. Bonomi PD, Finkelstein DM, Ruckdeschel JC, Blum RH, Green MD, Mason B, Hahn R, Tormey DC, Harris J, Comis R, Glick J. Combination chemotherapy vs single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 7:1602–1613. 1989;

13. Luedke DW, Einhorn L, Omura GA, Sarma PR, Bartolucci AA, Birch R, Greco FA. Randomized comparison of two combination regimen vs minimal chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 8:886–891. 1990;

14. Miller TP, Chen TT, Coltman CA Jr, O’Bryan RM, Vance RB, Weiss GB, Fletcher WS, Stephens RL, Livingston RB. Effect of alternating combination chemotherapy on survival of ambulatory patients with metastatic large cell and adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Clin Oncol 4:502–508. 1986;

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.