<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">KJIM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>Korean J Intern Med</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1226-3303</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2005-6648</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>The Korean Association of Internal Medicine</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3904/kjim.2019.272</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">kjim-2019-272</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Article</subject>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Infectious diseases</subject>
</subj-group></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Comparison of antimicrobial resistances and clinical features in community-onset <italic><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></italic> and <italic><italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic></italic> bacteremia</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sung</surname><given-names>Hwa Seok</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-kjim-2019-272"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af2-kjim-2019-272"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Je Won</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af1-kjim-2019-272"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bae</surname><given-names>Sohyun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-kjim-2019-272"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4666-0672</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>Ki Tae</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1-kjim-2019-272"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="af3-kjim-2019-272"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="af1-kjim-2019-272">
<label>1</label>Department of Emergency Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, <country>Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="af2-kjim-2019-272">
<label>2</label>Department of Emergency Medicine, Keimyung University Graduate School, Daegu, <country>Korea</country></aff>
<aff id="af3-kjim-2019-272">
<label>3</label>Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, <country>Korea</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1-kjim-2019-272">Correspondence to Ki Tae Kwon, M.D. Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, 807 Hoguk-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41404, Korea Tel: +82-53-200-2616 Fax: +82-53-200-2027 E-mail: <email>ktkwon@knu.ac.kr</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>3</month>
<year>2021</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2020</year></pub-date>
<volume>36</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>433</fpage>
<lpage>440</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2019</year></date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>4</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2019</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>7</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2019</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<license>
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ext-link>) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<sec><title>Background/Aims</title>
<p>The aim of this study was to compare antimicrobial resistance, clinical features, and outcomes of community-onset <italic><italic>Escherichia coli</italic></italic> (COEC) and <italic><italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic></italic> (COKP) bacteremia.</p></sec>
<sec><title>Methods</title>
<p>The medical records of patients diagnosed with <italic><italic>E. coli</italic></italic> or <italic><italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia</italic> in the emergency department of a 750-bed secondary care hospital in Daegu, Korea from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.</p></sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<p>A total of 866 patients with COEC bacteremia and 299 with COKP bacteremia were enrolled. COEC bacteremia, compared to COKP bacteremia, had higher rates of 3rd generation cephalosporin (3GC) (18.8% vs. 8.4%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and f luoroquinolone (FQ) (30.4% vs. 8.0%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) resistance. The patients with COKP bacteremia had higher Charlson comorbidity indices (CCI) (1.8 &#x000b1; 2.0 vs. 1.5 &#x000b1; 1.8, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.035), Pittsburgh bacteremia scores (PBS) (2.0 &#x000b1; 2.6 vs. 1.3 &#x000b1; 1.8, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and 30-day mortality (14.44% vs. 8.8%, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.008) than the patients with COEC bacteremia. Age younger than 70 years, male sex, polymicrobial infections, pneumonia, intra-abdominal infection, PBS &#x02265; 2, and Foley catheter insertion were independent predictive factors for COKP bacteremia compared to COEC bacteremia in the multivariate analysis. CCI, PBS, and intensive care unit admission were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in the multivariate analysis.</p></sec>
<sec><title>Conclusions</title>
<p>3GCs and FQs are still useful for the empirical treatment of patients with probable COKP bacteremia. The patients with COKP bacteremia had worse outcomes because of its greater severity and more frequent underlying comorbidities.</p></sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Cephalosporins</kwd>
<kwd>Quinolone</kwd>
<kwd>Comorbidity</kwd>
<kwd>Mortality</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
<p>Our previous research, performed at a secondary care community-based hospital in Daegu, Korea between 2003 to 2009, showed that <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> are major pathogens in community-onset bacteremia and that their levels of antimicrobial resistances are increasing, even in the community setting &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-kjim-2019-272">1</xref>&#x0005d;. In that study, 3rd generation cephalosporin (3GC) and fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance rates were 6.6% and 24.5% in <italic>E. coli</italic> and 4.9% and 4.9% in <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>, respectively. A study of community-onset bacteremia in a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea between 2012 to 2015 showed that 27.2% of <italic>E. coli</italic> and 14.9% of <italic>Klebsiella species</italic> were extended spectrum &#x003b2;-lactam (ESBL) producers and 37.8% of <italic>E. coli</italic> and 21.0% of <italic>Klebsiella species</italic> had ciprofloxacin resistance &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-kjim-2019-272">2</xref>&#x0005d;. The resistant rates to 3GC and FQ antimicrobials in <italic>Klebsiella species</italic> were consistently lower than in <italic>E. coli</italic> in both studies even though a recent study in a tertiary care hospital showed higher resistant rates. We sought to follow-up on our previous study of trend in antimicrobial resistance compared to the recent study conducted in a tertiary care hospital.</p>
<p>Although <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia have been studied individually or together, studies comparing antimicrobial resistance and clinical features and outcomes in these two major pathogens have rarely been conducted in a secondary care community-based hospital &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-kjim-2019-272">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b4-kjim-2019-272">4</xref>&#x0005d;. The aims of this study were to analyze current trends in antimicrobial resistance and compare antimicrobial resistance and clinical features and outcomes in community-onset <italic>E. coli</italic> (COEC) and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (COKP) bacteremia.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>METHODS</title>
<sec>
<title>Study population and design</title>
<p>This retrospective cohort study was performed at Daegu Fatima Hospital, a 750-bed secondary care community-based hospital in Daegu, Korea. Patients presenting to the emergency department with a first episode of <italic>E. coli</italic> or <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia between January 2010 and December 2016 were enrolled and defined as community-onset bacteremia, and their clinical microbiology laboratory data were reviewed (<xref rid="f1-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). From the electronic medical records, we collected data on pathogen antimicrobial resistance rates, patient demographic characteristics, source of infection, severity of bacteremia (Pittsburgh bacteremia score &#x0005b;PBS&#x0005d;) &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b5-kjim-2019-272">5</xref>&#x0005d;, underlying diseases (Charlson comorbidity index &#x0005b;CCI&#x0005d;) &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b6-kjim-2019-272">6</xref>&#x0005d;, antimicrobial use, and outcomes. Sites of infection were defined according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antimicrobial therapy was considered to be appropriate if antimicrobial agents to which the pathogen was susceptible were administered within 48 hours after the onset of bacteremia. 3GC resistance was defined as intermediate or resistant to ceftazidime and/or cefotaxime. Fluoroquinolone resistance was defined as intermediate or resistant to ciprofloxacin and/or levofloxacin. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Daegu Fatima Hospital (DFH18ORIO354). Written informed consent by the patients was waived due to a retrospective nature of our study.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Microbiological testing</title>
<p>A Bactec FX Instrument (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) was used for blood cultures. Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed on the VITEK II automated system (bioM&#x000e9;rieux, Durham, NC, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The results were analyzed with R version 3.2.3 (December 10, 2015; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous variables were expressed as the means &#x000b1; standard deviations and compared with the Student t test or Mann-Whitney <italic>U</italic> test. Categorical variables were compared with the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test. All tests of significance were two-tailed; <italic>p</italic> &#x02264; 0.05 was considered to be significant. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 7-day and 30-day mortality in community-onset <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia and predictive factors for <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia. All parameters with a <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.2 in the univariate analysis were considered in the multivariable analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>RESULTS</title>
<p>A total of 866 patients with COEC and 299 patients with COKP bacteremia were enrolled (<xref rid="f1-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="fig">Fig. 1</xref>). The resistance rates of antimicrobials, which commonly used to treat Gram negative strains, were higher in COEC bacteremia than in COKP bacteremia (<xref rid="t1-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). Isolates from both groups showed high susceptibility to imipenem and amikacin. Increasing trends of 3GC and FQ resistance were observed in both COEC and COKP bacteremia from 2010 to 2016 and the 3GC and FQ resistance rates were higher in COEC bacteremia than in COKP bacteremia throughout the study period (<xref rid="f2-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="fig">Fig. 2</xref>). The FQ resistance rates were higher than the 3GC resistance rates in COEC bacteremia; in contrast, the FQ and 3GC resistance rates were similar in COKP bacteremia.</p>
<p>Comparisons of demographic characteristics, comorbidities and clinical features in patients with the COEC and COKP bacteremia are shown in <xref rid="t2-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="table">Table 2</xref>. The patients with COEC bacteremia were older than those with COKP bacteremia (mean age, 71.3 &#x000b1; 14.1 vs. 69.5 &#x000b1; 14.1, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.049). The COKP bacteremia group had a higher proportion of male patients than the COEC bacteremia group (56.9% vs. 29.7%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). The patients with COKP bacteremia had more severe underlying comorbidities than the patients with COEC bacteremia (CCI, 1.8 &#x000b1; 2.0 vs. 1.5 &#x000b1; 1.8, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.035). Ulcer and moderate or severe liver disease were significantly more frequent in patients with <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) were more common sources of COEC bacteremia (53.4% vs. 19.7%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), on the other hand, intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) (36.6% vs. 62.2%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and pneumonia (6.3% vs. 13.0%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) were more common sources of COKP bacteremia. The subgroup analysis showed that the 3GC (18.6% vs. 5.8%, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.006) and FQ (20.3% vs. 5.0%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) resistance rates of COKP bacteremia in UTIs were higher than those in non-UTIs and the 3GC resistance rate (20.9% vs. 14.8%, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.034) of COEC bacteremia in non-IAIs was higher than that in IAIs. The severity at the onset of bacteremia was higher in COKP bacteremia than in COEC bacteremia (PBS, 2.0 &#x000b1; 2.6 vs. 1.3 &#x000b1; 1.8, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Although inappropriate antimicrobial therapy was more common in COEC bacteremia than in COKP bacteremia (22.8% vs. 10.0%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) due to higher antimicrobial resistance rates, the outcomes were better in COEC bacteremia than in COKP bacteremia (7-day mortality, 6.9% vs. 12.0%, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.007; 30-day mortality, 8.8% vs. 14.4%, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.008). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed consistently higher survival rate within 30 days of bacteremia onset in patients with COEC bacteremia than in patients with COKP bacteremia (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003d; 0.0304).</p>
<p>Age younger than 70 years, male sex, polymicrobial infections, pneumonia, IAIs, PBS &#x02265; 2, and Foley catheter insertion were independent predictive factors for COKP bacteremia compared to COEC bacteremia in the multivariate analysis (<xref rid="t3-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="table">Table 3</xref>). PBS was the only independent risk factor for 7-day mortality in the multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.92 to 2.46; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). CCI, PBS, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were the independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in the multivariate analysis (<xref rid="t4-kjim-2019-272" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>DISCUSSION</title>
<p>When we compared the results of this study with those of our previous study performed from 2003 to 2009 in the same hospital &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b1-kjim-2019-272">1</xref>&#x0005d;, we found that antimicrobial resistance to 3GCs and FQs increased, respectively, from 6.6% to 19.0% and 24.5% to 30.4% in COEC bacteremia and from 4.9% to 8.4% and 4.9% to 8.0% in COKP bacteremia. The resistance rates of <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> to 3GCs and FQs were much higher in the Korean Anti-microbial Resistance Monitoring System (KARMS) from 2013 to 2015 than in our study because KARMS data includes both nosocomial and community pathogens &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b7-kjim-2019-272">7</xref>&#x0005d;. In a recent study of community-onset <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella species</italic> bacteremia from 2012 to 2015, 27.2% of <italic>E. coli</italic> and 14.9% of <italic>Klebsiella species</italic> were ESBL producers and the ciprofloxacin resistance rate was 38.7% in <italic>E. coli</italic> and 21.0% in <italic>Klebsiella species</italic> &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-kjim-2019-272">2</xref>&#x0005d;; the resistant rates of 3GC and FQs were higher than reported in our studies, especially in the <italic>Klebsiella species</italic>, because the underlying comorbidities were more severe than those of our studies. Because Daegu Fatima Hospital is a secondary care community-based medical institution, we believe that our data reflects the antimicrobial resistance rates in community-onset infections, and therefore, 3GCs and FQs remain useful empirical options for community- onset infections caused by <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic>. The antimicrobial susceptibilities in community-acquired <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia were very high in other Korean and Taiwan studies, which supported our opinion &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b8-kjim-2019-272">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b9-kjim-2019-272">9</xref>&#x0005d;.</p>
<p>Compared to <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia, <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia had more underlying comorbidities; higher severity scores at the time of bacteremia onset; other unfavorable clinical characteristics and outcomes, such as ventilator therapy, deterioration of consciousness, ICU admission, and mortality. The multivariate risk factor analysis revealed that only underlying comorbidity (CCI), severity at the time of bacteremia onset (PBS), and ICU admission were significant independent factors for 30-day mortality; appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy and strain type were not independent factors. This is consistent with the results of a propensity score-matched analysis comparing the clinical outcomes of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> community-onset monomicrobial bacteremia &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b3-kjim-2019-272">3</xref>&#x0005d;. That study showed no significant differences in 14- and 28-day crude mortality rates between the two groups after appropriate matching, in which propensity score was calculated by the independent predictors of 28-day crude mortality assessed in a multivariable logistic regression model. In other words, <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> causes more severe bacteremia in patients with poorer underlying conditions than <italic>E. coli</italic>, leading to high mortality. The significant predictive factors for <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia compared to <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia were age &lt; 70, male sex, polymicrobial infections, pneumonia, IAIs, PBS &#x02265; 2, and Foley catheter insertion. When treating patients with community-onset Gram-negative bacteremia, it is important for clinicians to predict or know whether the causative micro-organisms are <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> or <italic>E. coli</italic> for antimicrobial selection and prognosis prediction.</p>
<p>One of the reasons for the low mortality rate of <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia is that UTI is the most frequent clinical diagnosis in patients with <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia. A study showed that UTI is a favorable factor for 30-day mortality in <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-kjim-2019-272">10</xref>&#x0005d;. UTI did not show a significant favorable impact on 30-day mortality in our study because of other important factors such as ICU admission, CCI, or PBS. Antimicrobial resistance and inappropriate antimicrobial therapy did not correlate with mortality in our study, probably due to the large proportion of patients with <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b10-kjim-2019-272">10</xref>&#x0005d;. In some population-based studies, <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia was more frequent in elderly patients who had urological co-morbidities and became more susceptible to UTI &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11-kjim-2019-272">11</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b13-kjim-2019-272">13</xref>&#x0005d;. In these studies, the male to female ratio was similar; in contrast, in our study and in a Korean study involving patients with acute pyelonephritis, <italic>E. coli</italic> was more common in women &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b14-kjim-2019-272">14</xref>&#x0005d;.</p>
<p>This study has some limitations. First, it is a retrospective study and was conducted at a single center. Accordingly, our data should be interpreted and applied with caution. Nevertheless, our hospital is the largest secondary care medical institution in the Daegu area and we analyzed more than one thousand cases of <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> community-onset bacteremia. In our study, the proportion of patients with underlying comorbidities was lower than a community-onset bacteremia study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Seoul &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b2-kjim-2019-272">2</xref>&#x0005d;. Therefore, we believe that our data are more representative of community-onset infections than those of studies performed in a tertiary care hospital. Second, we did not distinguish between healthcare-associated and community-acquired cases. In actual clinical situations, it may not be easy to clearly distinguish between the two. Instead, we focused on the comparative analysis of community-onset <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the increasing resistance to 3GCs and FQs in COEC and COKP bacteremia is a serious problem in Korea. Because <italic>E. coli</italic> and <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> are major causative microorganisms in community-onset bacteremia and their resistance to 3GCs and FQs has been increasing, carbapenems and piperacillin/tazobactam are increasingly used &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b15-kjim-2019-272">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b16-kjim-2019-272">16</xref>&#x0005d;. Given that <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia is the most common cause of Gram-negative bacteremia and UTI; therefore, clinicians requires attention to use 3GC and FQs as the empirical treatment of patients with probable COEC infections. However, the resistance rates to 3GCs and FQs remain were approximately 5% in COKP bacteremia caused by non-UTI; therefore, clinicians can still use 3GCs or FQs for empirical treatment of patients with probable COKP infections caused by non-UTI, instead of carbapenems or piperacillin/ tazobactam. Appropriate empirical FQs also have the advantage that decreased the duration of fever more than 3GCs in adult community-onset bacteremia &#x0005b;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b17-kjim-2019-272">17</xref>&#x0005d;. Importantly, COKP bacteremia showed higher mortality, owing to more comorbidities and greater severity, compared to COEC bacteremia. Rapid identification of <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> in community-onset bacteremia is helpful for predicting the clinical course and prognosis and selecting appropriate antimicrobials. The results of this comparison of antimicrobial resistance patterns and clinical features in community-onset <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic> bacteremia may be useful for refining diagnostic and treatment strategies.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>KEY MESSAGE</title>
<boxed-text position="float" orientation="portrait">
<p>1. The increasing resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins (3GCs) and f luoroquinolones (FQs) in community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia is a serious problem in Korea.</p>
<p>2. But, 3GCs and FQs are still useful for the empirical treatment of patients with probable community-onset <italic>K. pneumonia</italic> bacteremia caused by non-urinary tract infections.</p>
<p>3. The results of this study may help to apply the carbapenem sparing strategies to the treatment of community-onset infection</p>
</boxed-text>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="conflict"><p>No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.</p></fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="b1-kjim-2019-272">
<label>1</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>SW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>KW</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>DY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Third-generation cephalosporin resistance of community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia in a secondary hospital</article-title>
<source>Korean J Intern Med</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<fpage>49</fpage>
<lpage>56</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b2-kjim-2019-272">
<label>2</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Clinical prediction score for community-onset bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella species</italic></article-title>
<source>J Korean Med Sci</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<elocation-id>e116</elocation-id>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b3-kjim-2019-272">
<label>3</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kuo</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>CY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hsieh</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Propensity score matched analysis comparing the clinical outcome of <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> and <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> causing community-onset monomicrobial bacteremia</article-title>
<source>Medicine (Baltimore)</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<elocation-id>e7075</elocation-id>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b4-kjim-2019-272">
<label>4</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Leistner</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gurntke</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sakellariou</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-positive <italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> and <italic>E. coli</italic>: an analysis of the disease burden in a large cohort</article-title>
<source>Infection</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<fpage>991</fpage>
<lpage>997</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b5-kjim-2019-272">
<label>5</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Paterson</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ko</surname><given-names>WC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Von Gottberg</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>International prospective study of <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia: implications of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in nosocomial Infections</article-title>
<source>Ann Intern Med</source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>140</volume>
<fpage>26</fpage>
<lpage>32</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b6-kjim-2019-272">
<label>6</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Charlson</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pompei</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ales</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>MacKenzie</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation</article-title>
<source>J Chronic Dis</source>
<year>1987</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<fpage>373</fpage>
<lpage>383</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b7-kjim-2019-272">
<label>7</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ahn</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Increasing resistance to extended- spectrum cephalosporins, fluoroquinolone, and carbapenem in gram-negative bacilli and the emergence of carbapenem non-susceptibility in <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic>: analysis of Korean Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (KARMS) data from 2013 to 2015</article-title>
<source>Ann Lab Med</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<fpage>231</fpage>
<lpage>239</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b8-kjim-2019-272">
<label>8</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Juan</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chuang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>YT</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Clinical characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and capsular types of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia</article-title>
<source>Antimicrob Resist Infect Control</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<fpage>1</fpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b9-kjim-2019-272">
<label>9</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Siu</surname><given-names>LK</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yeh</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fung</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>FY</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title><italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> liver abscess: a new invasive syndrome</article-title>
<source>Lancet Infect Dis</source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<fpage>881</fpage>
<lpage>887</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b10-kjim-2019-272">
<label>10</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cheong</surname><given-names>HS</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kang</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Clinical significance of healthcare-associated infections in community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> bacteraemia</article-title>
<source>J Antimicrob Chemother</source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<fpage>1355</fpage>
<lpage>1360</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b11-kjim-2019-272">
<label>11</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bou-Antoun</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Davies</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guy</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>AP</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sheridan</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hope</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Descriptive epidemiology of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> bacteraemia in England, April 2012 to March 2014</article-title>
<source>Euro Surveill</source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<fpage>pii30329</fpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b12-kjim-2019-272">
<label>12</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Williamson</surname><given-names>DA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wiles</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Roberts</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Freeman</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Population-based incidence and comparative demographics of community-associated and healthcare-associated <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> bloodstream infection in Auckland, New Zealand, 2005-2011</article-title>
<source>BMC Infect Dis</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<fpage>385</fpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b13-kjim-2019-272">
<label>13</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Laupland</surname><given-names>KB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gregson</surname><given-names>DB</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Church</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ross</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pitout</surname><given-names>JD</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> bloodstream infections in a large Canadian region</article-title>
<source>Clin Microbiol Infect</source>
<year>2008</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<fpage>1041</fpage>
<lpage>1047</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b14-kjim-2019-272">
<label>14</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hyun</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>JY</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>HA</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ryu</surname><given-names>SY</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Comparison of <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> acute pyelonephritis in Korean patients</article-title>
<source>Infect Chemother</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>51</volume>
<fpage>130</fpage>
<lpage>141</lpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b15-kjim-2019-272">
<label>15</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Myung</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pai</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Trend of antibiotics usage for acute pyelonephritis in Korea based on National Health Insurance data 2010-2014</article-title>
<source>BMC Infect Dis</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<fpage>554</fpage>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b16-kjim-2019-272">
<label>16</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hwang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Trends and correlation between antibiotic usage and resistance pattern among hospitalized patients at university hospitals in Korea, 2004 to 2012: a nationwide multicenter study</article-title>
<source>Medicine (Baltimore)</source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<elocation-id>e13719</elocation-id>
</element-citation></ref>
<ref id="b17-kjim-2019-272">
<label>17</label>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>
<article-title>Clinical benefit of appropriate empirical fluoroquinolone therapy for adults with community-onset bacteremia in comparison with third-generation-cephalosporin therapy</article-title>
<source>Antimicrob Agents Chemother</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>61</volume>
<elocation-id>e02174</elocation-id>
</element-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<sec sec-type="display-objects">
<title>Figures and Tables</title>
<fig id="f1-kjim-2019-272" position="float">
<label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Patient selection flow chart.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="kjim-2019-272f1.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2-kjim-2019-272" position="float">
<label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Trends of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) and f luoroquinolone (FQ) resistance in community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia from 2010 to 2016. </p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="kjim-2019-272f2.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="t1-kjim-2019-272" position="float">
<label>Table 1.</label>
<caption><p>Comparisons of antimicrobial resistance rates in community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead><tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>E. coli</italic> (n = 886)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (n = 299)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Amikacin</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6/885 (0.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/297 (0.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.342</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ampicillin</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">455/781 (58.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">285/286 (99.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Aztreonam</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">167/884 (18.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27/297 (9.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3GCs</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">167/886 (18.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25/298 (8.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fluoroquinolone</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">269/886 (30.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24/299 (8.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cefazolin</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104/433 (24.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17/139 (12.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.019</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">159/655 (24.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27/218 (12.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ampicillin/sulbactam</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">83/158 (52.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/22 (9.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cefepime</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">167/885 (18.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26/297 (8.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Imipenem</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0/886 (0.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2/298 (0.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Piperacillin/tazobactam</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35/824 (4.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">21/282 (7.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.050</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Values are presented as numbers resistant/the number of total strains and proportions (%).</p>
<p>3GC, 3rd generation cephalosporin.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="t2-kjim-2019-272" position="float">
<label>Table 2.</label>
<caption><p>Comparisons of demographic characteristics, comorbidities and clinical features in community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> and <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead><tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>E. coli</italic> (n = 886)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>K. pneumoniae</italic> (n = 299)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age, yr</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">71.3 &#x000B1; 13.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">69.5 &#x000B1; 14.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.049</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male sex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">263 (29.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">170 (56.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Charlson comorbidity index</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5 &#x000B1; 1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8 &#x000B1; 2.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.035</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cerebral vascular disease</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">120 (13.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42 (14.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.903</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Diabetes mellitus</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">289 (32.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">105 (35.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.470</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Any tumor</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">154 (17.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49 (16.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.760</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moderate or severe liver disease</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43 (4.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (8.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.035</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Clinical diagnosis</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Urinary tract infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">473 (53.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59 (19.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Intraabdominal infections</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">298 (33.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">186 (62.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Pneumonia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">56 (6.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">39 (13.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;Others</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57 (6.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28 (9.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Polymicrobial infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25 (2.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (16.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pitt bacteremia score</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.3&#x000B1;1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.0&#x000B1;2.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fever</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
<td valign="top" align="center"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;36.1&#x000B0;C&#x02013;38.9&#x000B0;C</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">308 (34.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141 (47.2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;35.1&#x000B0;C&#x02013;36.0&#x000B0;C or 39.0&#x000B0;C&#x02013;39.9&#x000B0;C</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">512 (57.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">134 (45.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x02003;&lt; 35&#x000B0;C or &gt; 40&#x000B0;C</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">66 (7.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24 (8.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.842</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hypotension</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65 (7.3)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">41 (13.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mechanical ventilation</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14 (1.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18 (6.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cardiac arrest</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50 (5.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51 (17.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Altered Mental status</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">137 (15.5)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">72 (24.1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leukocytosis or leukopenia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">486 (54.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">179 (59.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Inappropriate antimicrobial therapy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">202 (22.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30 (10.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Initial CRP level</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.8 &#x000B1; 10.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.7 &#x000B1; 11.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ICU admission</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67 (7.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37 (12.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ICU admission period</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.5 &#x000B1; 14.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.8 &#x000B1; 9.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Foley catheter insertion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">218 (24.6)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119 (39.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">7-Day mortality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">61 (6.9)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">36 (12.0)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">30-Day mortality</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">78 (8.8)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43 (14.4)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.008</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Values are presented as mean &#x000B1; SD or number (%).</p>
<p>CRP, C-reactive protein; ICU, intensive care unit.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="t3-kjim-2019-272" position="float">
<label>Table 3.</label>
<caption><p>Predictive factors for <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> in patients with community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> or K. pneumoniae bacteremia</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead><tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">Univariate analysis<hr/></th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">Multivariate analysis<hr/></th>
</tr><tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">OR (95% CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">aOR (95% CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age &lt; 70 yr</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.38 (1.06&#x02013;1.81)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.017</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.48 (1.09&#x02013;2.00)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male sex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.12 (2.38&#x02013;4.10)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84 (1.34&#x02013;2.52)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Polymicrobial infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.92 (4.23&#x02013;11.57)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.46 (3.22&#x02013;9.49)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Urinary tract infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21 (0.16&#x02013;0.29)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64 (0.39&#x02013;1.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.092</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pneumonia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.22 (1.44&#x02013;3.41)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.41 (1.32&#x02013;4.36)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intra-abdominal infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.25 (2.48&#x02013;4.27)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.54 (1.57&#x02013;4.21)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCI &#x02265; 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.10 (0.84&#x02013;1.44)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.481</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PBS &#x02265; 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.01 (1.51&#x02013;2.68)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.89 (1.35&#x02013;2.65)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CRP &#x02265; 15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.05 (0.80&#x02013;1.37)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.742</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ICU admission</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.73 (1.12&#x02013;2.63)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.10 (0.64&#x02013;1.87)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.739</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Foley catheter insertion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.03 (1.53&#x02013;2.67)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.55 (1.10&#x02013;2.19)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.012</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Central line insertion</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.96 (0.69&#x02013;1.33)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.828</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</table-wrap>

<table-wrap id="t4-kjim-2019-272" position="float">
<label>Table 4.</label>
<caption><p>Risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with community-onset <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> or <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> bacteremia</p></caption>
<table rules="groups" frame="hsides">
<thead><tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">Univariate analysis<hr/></th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">Multivariate analysis<hr/></th>
</tr><tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">OR (95% CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">aOR (95% CI)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age, yr</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.01 (0.99&#x02013;1.02)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.478</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Male sex</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.76 (1.20&#x02013;2.56)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.08 (0.60&#x02013;1.92)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.804</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">K. pneumoniae</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.74 (1.16&#x02013;2.58)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58 (0.30&#x02013;1.09)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.099</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Polymicrobial infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.90 (0.37&#x02013;1.88)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.795</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Urinary tract infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.46 (0.30&#x02013;0.69)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.64 (0.35&#x02013;1.14)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pneumonia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.38 (3.30&#x02013;8.65)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.23 (0.57&#x02013;2.57)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.587</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Intra-abdominal infection</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.81 (0.55&#x02013;1.19)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.291</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CCI</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.31 (1.21&#x02013;1.42)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.24 (1.09&#x02013;1.40)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PBS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98 (1.80&#x02013;2.19)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.98 (1.77&#x02013;2.23)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Inappropriate antibiotic therapy</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.20 (0.75&#x02013;1.87)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.424</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Quinolone resistance</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.39 (0.91&#x02013;2.08)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.117</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.25 (0.62&#x02013;2.47)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.531</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">3GC resistance</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.64 (1.03&#x02013;2.55)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.323</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.30 (0.61&#x02013;2.74)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.491</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ICU admission</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.56 (6.07&#x02013;15.04)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.76 (7.25&#x02013;26.34)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&lt; 0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; PBS, Pittsburgh bacteremia score; 3GC, third-generation cephalosporin; ICU, intensive care unit.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap></sec>
</back></article>