Acute mitral valve dysfunction and cardiogenic shock due to escape of prosthetic mechanical leaflet

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35(1):250-251

Publication date (electronic) : 2020 January 2

doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.286

Mirae Lee, Su A Jo, Ik Hyun Park

Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea

Correspondence to Mirae Lee, M.D. Tel: +82-55-233-5819 Fax: +82-55-233-5704 E-mail: conatuse@gmail.com

Received 2019 August 26; Revised 2019 September 19; Accepted 2019 September 23.

A 43-year-old man who underwent prosthetic aortic valve and mitral valve (MV) replacement 24 years ago from infective endocarditis was referred to the emergency department for acute dyspnea. On arrival, he was started on mechanical ventilation because of desaturation (SpO₂ 68%). Tachycardia (178 beats/min), tachypnea (40 breaths/min), blood pressure of 110/90 mmHg, and stupor mentality were present. Cardiac murmur was suspected but difficult to confirm. Electrocardiogram showed atrial fibrillation and chest radiography revealed bilateral pulmonary edema. Transthoracic echocardiography showed mildly depressed left ventricular systolic function, no regional wall motion abnormality, and suspicious MV regurgitation. Despite mechanical ventilation and norepinephrine infusion, pulmonary edema and hypotension were aggravated. Emergent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was performed and allowed for an improvement in the patient’s hemodynamic condition. We performed portable transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to evaluate MV function. TEE showed massive mitral regurgitation extending into the right pulmonic vein. Only a mitral leaflet was observed on two-dimensional images (Fig. 1A, 1B, and Supplementary Video 1). Three-dimensional images of the MV showed a mobile valve leaflet (Fig. 1C, 1D, and Supplementary Video 2). Emergent MV replacement was performed. Only one mitral leaflet was presented (Fig. 1E) without thrombus or vegetation and the other leaflet was not found. After surgical MV replacement, ECMO and mechanical ventilation could be discontinued on days 2 and 3, respectively. To find the embolized mitral leaflet, we performed a computed tomography scan. Two fragments of the MV leaflet were detected in the left common and external iliac arteries. The fractured mitral leaflet was surgically removed (Fig. 1F and 1G). The patient recovered uneventfully.

Figure 1.

(A-D). Transesophageal echocardiographic images of prosthetic mitral valve. (A) Two-dimensional and (B) color Doppler images. Three-dimensional images in (C) systole and (D) diastole. (E) The surgically removed mitral valve with the single retained leaflet. (F) A fragment of a mitral valve leaflet from the left external iliac artery in the operation field. (G) Two fragments of a mitral valve leaflet removed from the left common and external iliac arteries.

Leaflet escape of the prosthetic valve is an unusual but potentially lethal complication. Although it is rare, when a patient with prosthetic valve presents with acute decompensated heart failure, escape of the valve leaflet should be considered.

Written informed consent by the patient was waived due to a retrospective nature of our report.