Clinical outcomes of and risk factors for secondary infection in patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study in South Korea

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2023;38(1):68-79
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 November 24
doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2022.084
1Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
2Division of Allergy and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
3Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
5Division of Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
6Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
7Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
Correspondence to: Song-I Lee, M.D., Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, 282 Munhwa-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 35015, Korea, Tel: +82-42-280-6816, Fax: +82-42-257-5753, E-mail: newcomet01@naver.com
Received 2022 March 3; Revised 2022 May 2; Accepted 2022 May 3.

Abstract

Background/Aims

Secondary infection with influenza virus occurs in critically ill patients and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality; however, there is limited information about it in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus, we investigated the clinical outcomes of and risk factors for secondary infections in patients with severe COVID-19.

Methods

This study included patients with severe COVID-19 who were admitted to seven hospitals in South Korea between February 2020 to February 2021. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with the risk of secondary infections.

Results

Of the 348 included patients, 104 (29.9%) had at least one infection. There was no statistically significant difference in the 28-day mortality (17.3% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.214), but in-hospital mortality was higher (29.8% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.002) in the infected group than in the non-infected group. The risk factors for secondary infection were a high frailty scale (odds ratio [OR], 1.314; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.123 to 1.538; p = 0.001), steroid use (OR, 3.110; 95% CI, 1.164 to 8.309; p = 0.024), and the application of mechanical ventilation (OR, 4.653; 95% CI, 2.533 to 8.547; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In-hospital mortality was more than doubled in patients with severe COVID-19 and secondary infections. A high frailty scale, the use of steroids and application of mechanical ventilation were risk factors for secondary infection.

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in December 2019 [1,2] and the cumulative number of reported cases worldwide has reached nearly 197 million; the cumulative deaths have reached 4.2 million [3].

Critically ill patients with COVID-19 have variable in-hospital mortality ranging from 29.9% to 53.4% [48]. A recent study reported that the risk factors for 90-day mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19 were older age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and a lower arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio [8]. Several studies report that bacterial co-infection in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 was low, although more than half of the patients received empirical antibiotics at the time of admission [9,10]. Early empirical antibiotics may lead to secondary bacterial or fungal infections [11,12].

Secondary bacterial infection in patients during the 2009 influenza pandemic contributed to significant mortality and morbidity [13]. A tertiary center in Israel reported that secondary infection in COVID-19 patients had an increased mortality risk compared to influenza patients [14]. However, there are a few studies on concomitant infections in patients with severe COVID-19, and fewer pathogen evaluations for secondary infections in the Republic of Korea. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the incidence, pathogens, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary infection in patients with severe COVID-19.

METHODS

Study design and patients

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study that enrolled adult (≥ 17 years old) patients with severe COVID-19 who were admitted to one of the seven tertiary or referral hospitals in South Korea from February 2, 2020 to February 28, 2021. In all participating hospitals, the same ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) bundles [15] and central line insertion bundles [16] were performed.

The Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the participating hospitals approved the study protocol, and the need for informed consent was waived due to the observational nature of the study (IRB of Chungnam National University Hospital, No. 2021-04-053, IRB of Chosun University Hospital, No. 2021-04-002).

Definition

SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by reverse-tran-scriptase polymerase chain reaction assay; an oxygen saturation level of 94% or less on room air or a need for oxygen support was defined as severe COVID-19 infection [17]. Secondary infections occurring during illness or hospitalization were classified as hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or VAP, bloodstream infection (BSI), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) [18,19]. The definitions of BSI, CLABSI, HAP or VAP, and CAUTI are provided in Supplementary Table 1. Definitions of vital signs and laboratory/radiologic data before and after infection are shown in Supplementary Table 2.

Data collection and outcomes

All study data were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Data on basic demographic characteristics, including sex, age, and data regarding initial laboratory, radiology evaluations, the need for invasive support (mechanical ventilation and continuous renal replacement therapy [CRRT], extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]), and use of vasopressors were collected. Initial confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, 65 years of age and older (CURB-65) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and frailty scale were analysed.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. Student’s t test was used for continuous data, and Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical data. Multivariate logistic regression analyses with a backward elimination procedure, including all predictors showing a p ≤ 0.10 in the univariate analysis, were performed to obtain the adjusted odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) and to define the variables that were independently associated with disease severity. All p values were two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Characteristics of patients

From February 2, 2020 to February 28, 2021, 1,565 patients were admitted to the hospital for COVID-19 pneumonia. After excluding 1,077 non-severe COVID-19 patients and 140 patients without any type of culture, 348 patients were included in the analysis. Among the 348 patients, 145 patients were positive for any type of culture or bacterial polymerase chain reaction. Among them, 41 patients were diagnosed as colonization because they did not meet the definition of infection mentioned in Supplementary Table 1, and we classified them as the noninfected group. Of the 348 patients, 104 (29.9%) patients had at least one infection and were classified as an infected group; 244 (70.1%) patients without secondary infection were classified as a noninfected group (Fig. 1).

Figure 1

Flowchart of patients. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

The baseline characteristics of patients at hospital admission are summarized in Table 1. Patients in the infected group were slightly older than those in the noninfected group (70.0 ± 13.1 years vs. 68.1 ± 12.7 years, p = 0.198). There was no statistical difference between the symptoms at admission and the period from symptom onset to hospitalization between the two groups. The CURB-65 (1.6 ± 1.1 vs. 1.2 ± 1.1, p < 0.001), SOFA (4.3 ± 4.0 vs. 2.7 ± 3.1, p < 0.001), and APACHE II scores (12.4 ± 7.3 vs. 9.8 ± 5.1, p = 0.001), CCI (3.5 ± 1.6 vs. 3.1 ± 1.8, p = 0.045), and frailty scale (4.1 ± 2.4 vs. 3.2 ± 1.8, p < 0.001) were higher in the infected group than in the noninfected group. Diabetes mellitus (DM, 39.4% vs. 27.0%, p = 0.022) was more common in the infected group than in the noninfected group; other comorbidities showed no statistically significant difference. Additionally, the body temperature (36.8°C ± 0.8°C vs. 37.1°C ± 0.9°C, p = 0.001) and Glasgow coma scale (13 ± 4 vs. 14 ± 2, p = 0.002) score were lower in the infected group, but the duration of fever was slightly longer in this infected group (3.0 days [interquartile range, IQR, 0.0 to 8.0] vs. 2.0 days [IQR, 1.0 to 6.0], p = 0.076).

Baseline characteristics of patients with severe COVID-19

Laboratory data and radiologic findings at hospital admission are presented in Supplementary Table 3. While comparing laboratory data from the infected group with that from the noninfected group it was observed that the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, pH, albumin, and d-dimer levels were lower, and the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, potassium, C-reactive protein (CRP), and prothrombin time were higher in the infected group. Radiologic evaluation revealed fewer unilateral cases and more bilateral cases in the infected group.

Treatment and clinical outcomes of patients

The treatment and clinical outcomes of the patients are presented in Table 2. Vasopressors (35.6% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001) and corticosteroids (89.4% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.009) were more frequently used in the infected group. The most used steroid type was dexamethasone, followed by methylprednisolone and corticosteroid. There was no statistical difference in the use of steroid type, initial dose, and duration between the two groups (Supplementary Table 4). The use of antibiotics and remdesivir did not significantly different between the two groups. The most used antibiotics were 3rd generation cephalosporine (39.1%) and quinolone (32.5%). Among the types of antibiotics, piperacillin/tazobactam, carbapenem, aminoglycoside, vancomycin, teicoplanin, metronidazole, and colistin were used more in the infected group than in the noninfected group (Supplementary Table 4). Adequacy of antibiotic use was 58.7% in the infected group and 17.2% in the noninfected group (p < 0.001). CRRT (14.4% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001), mechanical ventilation (61.5% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001), ECMO (13.5% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomy (26.0% vs. 4.1%, p < 0.001) were also more commonly performed in the infected group.

Treatment and clinical outcomes

There was no statistically significant difference in 28-day mortality (17.3% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.214) between the two groups. However, in-hospital mortality was higher (29.8% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.002) and the length of hospital stay was longer (36.9 ± 33.7 days vs. 20.1 ± 13.9 days, p < 0.001) in the infected group than in the noninfected group.

Factors associated with secondary infection

The results of the multivariate analysis of factors associated with infection are shown in Table 3. After adjusting for confounders, independent predictors of infection included the high frailty scale (OR, 1.314; 95% CI, 1.123 to 1.538; p = 0.001), corticosteroid use (OR, 3.110; 95% CI, 1.164 to 8.309; p = 0.024) and application of mechanical ventilation (OR, 4.653; 95% CI, 2.533 to 8.547; p < 0.001).

Univariate and multivariate risk factors associated with secondary infection (logistic analysis)

Pathogens of secondary infection and difference before and after infection

In the infected group, 73 patients (70.2%) had HAP and/or VAP, 36 patients (34.6%) had BSI and/or CLABSI, and 17 patients (16.3%) had CAUTI. The time of diagnosis of secondary infection was 13.0 days (IQR, 9.0 to 21.0) from symptom onset and 7.0 days (IQR, 4.0 to 16.0) from hospital admission (Supplementary Fig. 1). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens were identified in 51.0% (53/104) of the infected group.

Fig. 2 shows the pathogens associated with each infection. The HAP and/or VAP pathogens were as follows: Acinetobacter baumannii (23/73, 31.5%), Klebsiella species (16/73, 21.9%), Streptococcus species (14/73, 19.2%), Haemophilus influenzae (10/73, 13.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6/73, 8.2%), Escherichia coli (3/73, 4.1%), other gram-negative bacteria (3/73, 4.1%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (2/73, 2.7%). The time of diagnosis of infection for these pathogens was 12.0 days (IQR, 8.5 to 16.5) from symptom onset and 5.0 days (IQR, 4.0 to 11.5) from hospital admission (Supplementary Table 5). There were no significant differences in the vital signs before and after infection, but white blood cell (WBC) and CRP levels were significantly elevated (Table 4). Chest radiography showed ground glass opacity (51/73, 69.9%), consolidation (40/73, 54.8%), and aggravation (60/73, 82.2%). The MDR pathogen was seen in 46.6% (34/73) of cases with HAP/VAP, and the most common strain was multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MRAB) (28.8%, 21/73) (Supplementary Table 6).

Figure 2

Identified pathogens for each secondary infection, (A) pathogen of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), (B) pathogen of bloodstream infection (BSI) or central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), (C) pathogen of catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Changes in vital signs and laboratory/radiologic results before and after secondary infection

The BSI and CLABSI pathogens were as follows: coagulase-negative staphylococci (9/36, 25.0%), A. baumannii (8/36, 22.2%), Enterococcus species (4/36, 11.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (3/36, 8.3%), Klebsiella species (3/36, 8.3%), Candida species (3/36, 8.3%), Streptococcus species (2/36, 5.6%), P. aeruginosa (2/36, 5.6%), other gram-negative bacteria (2/36, 5.6%), Corynebacterium species (1/36, 2.8%) and other fungi (1/36, 2.8%). The patients’ lines at the time of BSI or CLABSI infection were C-line (35/36, 97.2%), Hemocath (7/36, 19.4%), A-line (34/36, 94.4%), ECMO line (4/36, 11.1%). The time of diagnosis of infection for these pathogens was 21.5 days (IQR, 14.3 to 31.0) from symptom onset and 17.0 days (IQR, 8.8 to 26.5) from hospital admission (Supplementary Table 5). Before and after infection, respiratory rate and WBC levels were slightly increased (p = 0.070, p = 0.055, respectively), but there was no statistically significant difference (Table 4). The MDR pathogen was seen in 38.9% (14/36) of cases with BSI/CLABSI, and the most common strain was extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) (+) bacteria (16.7%, 6/36) (Supplementary Table 6).

The CAUTI pathogens were as follows: E. coli (9/17, 52.9%), Enterococcus species (3/17, 17.6%), Klebsiella species (3/17, 17.6%), and other gram-negative bacteria (3/17, 17.6%). The time of diagnosis of infection was 14.0 days (IQR, 3.5 to 25.0) from symptom onset and 11.0 days (IQR, 0.0 to 20.0) from hospital admission (Supplementary Table 5). There were no statistically significant differences in vital signs or laboratory data before and after infection (Table 4). The MDR pathogen was seen in 52.9% (9/17) cases with CAUTI, and the most common strain was ESBL (+) bacteria (35.3%, 6/17) (Supplementary Table 6).

DISCUSSION

In this multicenter cohort study, secondary infection was identified in 29.9% of patients with severe COVID-19. The score to evaluate the severity of patients in the infected group was higher than that in the noninfected group at the time of admission, and with a longer duration of fever. The use of vasopressors, corticosteroids, CRRT, mechanical ventilation, and ECMO during hospitalization was higher in the infected group. There was no difference in 28-day mortality, but in-hospital mortality was higher and hospital length of stay was longer in the infected group. High frailty scales, steroid use, and the application of mechanical ventilation were associated with the occurrence of secondary infections.

In previous studies, secondary infections occurred in 3.6% to 46% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients [2,1925]. In this study, secondary infection was identified in 29.9% of patients with severe COVID-19, and the outcomes were compared. Grasselli et al. [22] showed that hospital-acquired infection occurred in 46% of critically ill patients with COVID-19; VAP was the most common infection, found in 51%; BSI was found in 35%, and urinary tract infection (UTI) in 8% [22]. Huang et al. [24] reported that secondary infection as a complication was found in 10% of COVID-19 patients, and this study included all patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Ripa et al. [19] showed that secondary infection was diagnosed in 9.3% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Vijay et al. [25] reported that 3.6% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients developed secondary bacterial or fungal infections. The incidence of secondary infection varies, and the country, type of hospital, and severity of the enrolled patients may have affected the results. In the study by Langford et al. [18], bacterial infections occurred in 5.9% (95% CI, 3.8% to 8.0%) of all hospitalized patients and 8.1% (95% CI, 2.3% to 13.8%) of critically ill patients. Bacterial infections were more common in patients with higher severity. In a study by Sogaard et al. [26], hospital-acquired bacterial and fungal infections were more frequent among intensive care unit (ICU) patients than other patients (36.6% vs. 1.7%). Therefore, it seems that the incidence of secondary infection in severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients is higher than that in general COVID-19 patients. In a previous study of critically ill patients, secondary infections were common (about 51%) and the risk of infection was associated with the duration of ICU stay [27]. In a study of 55 ICUs from eight developing countries, device-associated nosocomial infection was seen in 14.7% patients, of which 41% were VAP, 30% CLABSI, and 29% CAUTI [28]. The percentage infection rate in critically ill COVID-19 patients was similar to that in critically ill patients with other illnesses, but there is a study that showed that the risk of healthcare-associated infections increases in situations such as a COVID-19 surge [29]. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to the occurrence of secondary infection in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Factors related to secondary infection include age, positive end-expiratory pressure, treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics at admission, anti-inflammatory treatment, baseline lymphocyte count, baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and ICU admission in the first 48 hours after hospital admission [19,22,30]. In this study, the occurrence of secondary infection was associated with the frailty scale, use of corticosteroids and application of mechanical ventilation. The use of anti-inflammatory agents may [3032] or may not [22,33] increase the risk of infection. However, the use of steroids [34,35] and increased severity [36] of the patient may increase the likelihood of a concomitant infection; therefore, it is necessary to carefully examine whether additional infections occur in patients.

Our study provided a detailed description of secondary infections in severe to critically ill COVID-19 patients. In this study, the common pathogens of HAP and VAP were A. baumannii, Klebsiella species, and Streptococcus species, that of BSI or CLABSI were coagulase-negative staphylococci and A. baumannii, and that of CAUTI was E. coli. Various infectious pathogens were identified in other studies. VAP is one of the common complications in critically ill COVID-19 patients. In a study of critically ill COVID-19 patients by Meawed et al. [37], the bacterial pathogens commonly found in VAP were pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (41.1%) and MRAB (27.4%). The commonly identified strain in the coVAPid cohort study was P. aeruginosa (24.9%), and MDR pathogen was found in 20.7% of the cases [38]. A meta-analysis of Ippolito et al. [39] showed various pathogens in VAP, and the MDR pathogen was identified in 1.4–67% of the cases. Grasselli et al. [22] reported that in critically ill COVID-19 patients, the common pathogens for VAP were S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, the common pathogens for BSI and CLASI were Enterococcus species and Enterobacter species, and the common pathogens for UTI were E. coli, similar to our results. The most common pathogens of respiratory tract infection in other studies are S. aureus [40], Mycoplasma species [18,41], and Klebsiella species [42]. The most common pathogens of BSI or CLABSI in other studies are S. aureus [40], coagulase-negative staphylococci [19,30,43], enterococcus species [30,44,45], A. baumannii [21,32], P. aeruginosa [32]. A study by Fakih et al. [46] compared CLABSI and CAUTI before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. There was an increase in coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Candida species among CLABSI pathogens after the COVID-19 pandemic, but there was no significant difference in CAUTI pathogens before and after the pandemic [46]. The type of pathogen and drug resistance are affected by the type of hospital and country. Therefore, we believe that identifying the pathogens of each country and hospital and using appropriate antibiotics will help improve patient prognosis.

Changes in vital signs and laboratory data before and after infection have rarely been studied. In previous correspondence, mean blood pressure (91.8 ± 12.0 mmHg vs. 85.3 ± 12.5 mmHg, p = 0.002) decreased slightly, but other vital signs were not significantly different. Chest radiography worsened in 58.1% of the infected group [47]. In this study, the vital signs before and after infection were directly compared, and there was no significant difference. However, chest radiography worsened after HAP or VAP, and the WBC count and CRP increased after infection. Therefore, it seems that the WBC count and CRP levels are good indicators for detecting the occurrence of secondary infections.

This study had several limitations. First, the study group included only patients in tertiary or referral hospitals capable of critical care. This may have affected the results, as it included patients with worsening conditions who had been transferred from other hospitals or from living treatment centers. Second, data were collected from the electronic health record database instead of manually reviewed medical records; thus, excluding possible levels of detail. Third, we were operating on COVID-19 quarantine beds in a ward where intensive treatment is possible. Therefore, it was impossible to analyse the differences in strain rates according to the wards and ICUs. Fourth, we classified the pathogen by setting diagnostic criteria for secondary infection. However, it may have been difficult to completely differentiate between colonization and pathogens.

In conclusion, secondary infection was confirmed in 29.9% of patients with severe COVID-19, and HAP or VAP was the most common infection. In-hospital mortality was more than doubled in the group of patients with secondary infections. Patients with a high frailty scale, the use of steroids and application of mechanical ventilation are associated with a high risk of secondary infection. Therefore, we believe that rapid diagnosis of infection and appropriate prevention and treatment in this patient population can help improve patient prognosis.

KEY MESSAGE

1. Secondary infection was confirmed in 29.9% of patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

2. Hospital acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia was the most common secondary infection and the in-hospital mortality was more than doubled in patients with secondary infection.

3. Patients with a high frailty scale, use of steroids and application of mechanical ventilation are associated with a high risk of secondary infection.

Supplementary Information

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Hu B, Guo H, Zhou P, Shi ZL. Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Nat Rev Microbiol 2021;19:141–154.
2. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054–1062.
3. World Health Organization. Weekly epidemiological update on COVID-19 3. August. 2021. [Internet]. Geneva (CH): WHO; 2021. [cited 2022 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports .
4. Anesi GL, Jablonski J, Harhay MO, et al. Characteristics, outcomes, and trends of patients with COVID-19-related critical illness at a learning health system in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2021;174:613–621.
5. Armstrong RA, Kane AD, Cook TM. Outcomes from intensive care in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Anaesthesia 2020;75:1340–1349.
6. Ferrando-Vivas P, Doidge J, Thomas K, et al. Prognostic factors for 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019: an observational cohort study. Crit Care Med 2021;49:102–111.
7. Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:1345–1355.
8. COVID-ICU Group on behalf of the REVA Network and the COVID-ICU Investigators. Clinical characteristics and day-90 outcomes of 4244 critically ill adults with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2021;47:60–73.
9. Rawson TM, Moore LS, Zhu N, et al. Bacterial and fungal coinfection in individuals with coronavirus: a rapid review to support COVID-19 antimicrobial prescribing. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2459–2468.
10. Vaughn VM, Gandhi TN, Petty LA, et al. Empiric antibacterial therapy and community-onset bacterial coinfection in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a multi-hospital cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:e533–e541.
11. Bhimraj A, Morgan RL, Shumaker AH, et al. IDSA Guidelines on the Treatment and Management of Patients with COVID-19 [Internet] Arlington (VA): Infectious Diseases Society of America; 2021. [cited 2022 Sep 24]. Available from: https://www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/covid-19-guideline-treatment-and-management/ .
12. Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Coronavirus disease 2019, superinfections, and antimicrobial development: what can we expect? Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2736–2743.
13. Morris DE, Cleary DW, Clarke SC. Secondary bacterial infections associated with influenza pandemics. Front Microbiol 2017;8:1041.
14. Shafran N, Shafran I, Ben-Zvi H, et al. Secondary bacterial infection in COVID-19 patients is a stronger predictor for death compared to influenza patients. Sci Rep 2021;11:12703.
15. Papazian L, Klompas M, Luyt CE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:888–906.
16. Tang HJ, Lin HL, Lin YH, Leung PO, Chuang YC, Lai CC. The impact of central line insertion bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infection. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:356.
17. Grein J, Ohmagari N, Shin D, et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2327–2336.
18. Langford BJ, So M, Raybardhan S, et al. Bacterial co-infection and secondary infection in patients with COVID-19: a living rapid review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2020;26:1622–1629.
19. Ripa M, Galli L, Poli A, et al. Secondary infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: incidence and predictive factors. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021;27:451–457.
20. Bardi T, Pintado V, Gomez-Rojo M, et al. Nosocomial infections associated to COVID-19 in the intensive care unit: clinical characteristics and outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;40:495–502.
21. Kokkoris S, Papachatzakis I, Gavrielatou E, et al. ICU-acquired bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. J Hosp Infect 2021;107:95–97.
22. Grasselli G, Scaravilli V, Mangioni D, et al. Hospital-acquired infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Chest 2021;160:454–465.
23. Li J, Wang J, Yang Y, et al. Etiology and antimicrobial resistance of secondary bacterial infections fin patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020;9:153.
24. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020;395:497–506.
25. Vijay S, Bansal N, Rao BK, et al. Secondary infections in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Indian experience. Infect Drug Resist 2021;14:1893–1903.
26. Sogaard KK, Baettig V, Osthoff M, et al. Community-acquired and hospital-acquired respiratory tract infection and bloodstream infection in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. J Intensive Care 2021;9:10.
27. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 2009;302:2323–2329.
28. Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Salomao R, et al. Device-associated nosocomial infections in 55 intensive care units of 8 developing countries. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:582–591.
29. Baker MA, Sands KE, Huang SS, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on healthcare-associated infections. Clin Infect Dis 2022;74:1748–1754.
30. Giacobbe DR, Battaglini D, Ball L, et al. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Eur J Clin Invest 2020;50:e13319.
31. Saade A, Moratelli G, Dumas G, et al. Infectious events in patients with severe COVID-19: results of a cohort of patients with high prevalence of underlying immune defect. Ann Intensive Care 2021;11:83.
32. Nasir N, Rehman F, Omair SF. Risk factors for bacterial infections in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: a case-control study. J Med Virol 2021;93:4564–4569.
33. Gragueb-Chatti I, Lopez A, Hamidi D, et al. Impact of dexamethasone on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and blood stream infections in COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: a multicenter retrospective study. Ann Intensive Care 2021;11:87.
34. Chaudhary NS, Donnelly JP, Moore JX, Baddley JW, Safford MM, Wang HE. Association of baseline steroid use with long-term rates of infection and sepsis in the REGARDS cohort. Crit Care 2017;21:185.
35. Youssef J, Novosad SA, Winthrop KL. Infection risk and safety of corticosteroid use. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2016;42:157–176.
36. Napolitano LM. Use of severity scoring and stratification factors in clinical trials of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51Suppl 1. :S67–S80.
37. Meawed TE, Ahmed SM, Mowafy SM, Samir GM, Anis RH. Bacterial and fungal ventilator associated pneumonia in critically ill COVID-19 patients during the second wave. J Infect Public Health 2021;14:1375–1380.
38. Nseir S, Martin-Loeches I, Povoa P, et al. Relationship between ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a planned ancillary analysis of the coVAPid cohort. Crit Care 2021;25:177.
39. Ippolito M, Misseri G, Catalisano G, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10:545.
40. Nori P, Cowman K, Chen V, et al. Bacterial and fungal coinfections in COVID-19 patients hospitalized during the New York City pandemic surge. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:84–88.
41. Lansbury L, Lim B, Baskaran V, Lim WS. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect 2020;81:266–275.
42. Maes M, Higginson E, Pereira-Dias J, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Crit Care 2021;25:25.
43. Buetti N, Ruckly S, de Montmollin E, et al. COVID-19 increased the risk of ICU-acquired bloodstream infections: a case-cohort study from the multicentric OUTCOMEREA network. Intensive Care Med 2021;47:180–187.
44. Cataldo MA, Tetaj N, Selleri M, et al. Incidence of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in COVID-19 patients in intensive care: an alarming “collateral effect”. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020;23:290–291.
45. Bonazzetti C, Morena V, Giacomelli A, et al. Unexpectedly high frequency of enterococcal bloodstream infections in coronavirus disease 2019 patients admitted to an Italian ICU: an observational study. Crit Care Med 2021;49:e31–e40.
46. Fakih MG, Bufalino A, Sturm L, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): the urgent need to refocus on hard-wiring prevention efforts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:26–31.
47. Lee SI, Koh JS, Kim YJ, et al. Secondary infection among hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care setting. Respirology 2021;26:277–278.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Flowchart of patients. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019.

Figure 2

Identified pathogens for each secondary infection, (A) pathogen of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), (B) pathogen of bloodstream infection (BSI) or central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), (C) pathogen of catheter-associated urinary tract infection.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients with severe COVID-19

Variable All patients (n = 348) Infected (n = 104) Noninfected (n = 244) p value
Age, yr 68.7 ± 12.8 70.0 ± 13.1 68.1 ± 12.7 0.198
Male sex 180 (51.7) 60 (57.7) 120 (49.2) 0.146
Smoking 64 (18.4) 23 (22.1) 41 (16.8) 0.242
Symptom at admission 314 (90.2) 94 (90.4) 220 (90.2) 0.949
Symptom to admission, day 5.2 ± 4.8 5.3 ± 4.8 5.2 ± 4.9 0.910
Body mass index 24.7 ± 4.2 24.9 ± 4.3 24.7 ± 4.2 0.627
Scoring systems
 CURB-65 1.3 ± 1.0 1.6 ± 1.1 1.2 ± 1.1 < 0.001
 SOFA score 3.2 ± 3.4 4.3 ± 4.0 2.7 ± 3.1 < 0.001
 APACHE II score 10.6 ± 6.0 12.4 ± 7.3 9.8 ± 5.1 0.001
 Charlson comorbidity index 3.2 ± 1.8 3.5 ± 1.6 3.1 ± 1.8 0.045
 Frailty scale 3.5 ± 2.0 4.1 ± 2.4 3.2 ± 1.8 < 0.001
Comorbidity
 Hypertension 186 (53.4) 62 (59.6) 124 (50.8) 0.132
 DM 107 (30.7) 41 (39.4) 66 (27.0) 0.022
 COPD 10 (2.9) 3 (2.9) 7 (2.9) 0.994
 Cerebrovascular disease 24 (6.9) 3 (2.9) 21 (8.6) 0.054
 Heart failure 10 (2.9) 3 (2.9) 7 (2.9) 0.994
 Liver cirrhosis 5 (1.4) 0 5 (2.0) 0.141
 Chronic kidney disease 4 (1.1) 1 (1.0) 3 (1.2) 0.830
 Malignancy 24 (6.9) 5 (4.8) 19 (7.8) 0.315
 Organ transplantation 1 (0.3) 1 (1.0) 0 0.125
Initial vital signs
 SBP, mmHg 134 ± 24 138 ± 29 132 ± 20 0.068
 DBP, mmHg 77 ± 14 78 ± 15 77 ± 14 0.465
 HR, /min 87 ± 16 88 ± 17 86 ± 15 0.267
 RR, /min 21 ± 4 21 ± 4 21 ± 4 0.350
 Body temperature, °C 37.0 ± 0.9 36.8 ± 0.8 37.1 ± 0.9 0.001
 SpO2, % 94.7 ± 6.3 94.8 ± 4.8 94.7 ± 6.8 0.770
 GCS 14 ± 3 13 ± 4 14 ± 2 0.002
Duration of fever 3.0 (0.0–6.0) 3.0 (0.0–8.0) 2.0 (1.0–6.0) 0.076

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; CURB-65, confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, 65 years of age and older; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; RR, respiratory rate; SpO2, saturation pulse oxygen; GCS, Glasgow coma scale.

Table 2

Treatment and clinical outcomes

Variable All patients (n = 348) Infected (n = 104) Noninfected (n = 244) p value
Treatment
 Remdesivir 158 (45.4) 53 (51.0) 105 (43.0) 0.174
 Antibiotics 309 (88.8) 88 (84.6) 221 (90.6) 0.107
 Vasopressor 60 (17.2) 37 (35.6) 23 (9.4) < 0.001
 Corticosteroid 282 (81.0) 93 (89.4) 189 (77.5) 0.009
 CRRT 22 (6.3) 15 (14.4) 7 (2.9) < 0.001
 Mechanical ventilation 118 (33.9) 64 (61.5) 54 (22.1) < 0.001
 ECMO 19 (5.5) 14 (13.5) 5 (2.0) < 0.001
Tracheostomy 37 (10.6) 27 (26.0) 10 (4.1) < 0.001
Outcomes
 28-day mortality 48 (13.8) 18 (17.3) 30 (12.3) 0.214
 In-hospital mortality 68 (19.5) 31 (29.8) 37 (15.2) 0.002
 Length of hospital stay, day 25.1 ± 23.1 36.9 ± 33.7 20.1 ± 13.9 < 0.001

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate risk factors associated with secondary infection (logistic analysis)

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


OR 95% CI p value OR 95% CI p value
Age 1.012 0.994–1.031 0.198

Male sex 0.710 0.447–1.128 0.147

Body mass index 1.014 0.959–1.072 0.626

Scoring systems

 CURB-65 1.486 1.186–1.863 0.001 1.239 0.890–1.724 0.204

 SOFA score 1.138 1.066–1.216 < 0.001 0.963 0.874–1.062 0.449

 APACHE II score 1.072 1.032–1.114 < 0.001 1.035 0.961–1.114 0.361

 Charlson comorbidity index 1.141 1.002–1.300 0.047 0.952 0.766–1.184 0.661

 Frailty scale 1.247 1.116–1.395 < 0.001 1.314 1.123–1.538 0.001

Comorbidity, %

 Hypertension 1.429 0.897–2.275 0.133

 DM 1.755 1.082–2.848 0.023 1.220 0.597–2.497 0.585

 COPD 1.006 0.255–3.967 0.994

 Cerebrovascular disease 0.315 0.092–1.082 0.066

 Heart failure 1.006 0.255–3.967 0.994

 Malignancy 0.598 0.217–1.647 0.320

Laboratory findings

 PaO2/FiO2 ratio 0.998 0.996–0.999 0.010 1.000 0.998–1.003 0.881

 White cell count, 1,000/mm3 1.026 0.974–1.080 0.336

 Platelet count, 1,000/mm3 1.000 0.997–1.003 0.813

 Albumin, g/dL 0.612 0.404–0.927 0.020 1.246 0.635–2.446 0.523

 C-reactive protein, mg/dL 1.031 1.000–1.063 0.050 1.009 0.966–1.055 0.681

 Procalcitonin, ng/mL 1.034 0.976–1.096 0.258

 Corticosteroid use 2.460 1.230–4.922 0.011 3.110 1.164–8.309 0.024

 Apply of mechanical ventilation 5.630 3.423–9.258 < 0.001 4.653 2.533–8.547 < 0.001

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CURB-65, confusion, urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, blood pressure, 65 years of age and older; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; DM, diabetes mellitus; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PaO2, arterial oxygen partial pressure; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen.

Table 4

Changes in vital signs and laboratory/radiologic results before and after secondary infection

Pre-infection Post-infection p value
HAP or VAP (n = 73)
 Mean blood pressure, mmHg 78 ± 13 76 ± 11 0.175
 Heart rate, beats/min 95 ± 23 94 ± 23 0.748
 Respiratory rate, breaths/min 24 ± 6 23 ± 5 0.515
 Body temperature, °C 37.3 ± 0.9 37.2 ± 0.8 0.348
 O2 need/FiO2, % 41 ± 18 42 ± 17 0.581
 White cell count, 1,000/mm3 9.95 ± 5.11 12.97 ± 6.73 < 0.001
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL 8.8 ± 6.6 11.6 ± 10.5 0.040
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL 0.69 ± 1.38 1.03 ± 2.43 0.388
BSI/CLABSI (n = 36)
 Mean blood pressure, mmHg 78 ± 17 72 ± 16 0.104
 Heart rate, beats/min 101 ± 25 106 ± 27 0.322
 Respiratory rate, breaths/min 25 ± 6 27 ± 7 0.070
 Body temperature, °C 39.2 ± 10.1 37.6 ± 1.1 0.336
 O2 need/FiO2, % 54 ± 24 57 ± 25 0.181
 White cell count, 1,000/mm3 13.27 ± 7.04 15.17 ± 5.92 0.055
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL 11.7 ± 9.0 13.2 ± 10.4 0.381
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL 1.80 ± 3.68 1.44 ± 1.90 0.599
Catheter associated urinary tract infection (n = 17)
 Mean blood pressure, mmHg 85 ± 18 76 ± 16 0.089
 Heart rate, beats/min 100 ± 21 98 ± 27 0.708
 Respiratory rate, breaths/min 25 ± 7 23 ± 6 0.318
 Body temperature, °C 37.1 ± 0.7 37.5 ± 0.9 0.106
 O2 need/FiO2, % 35 ± 11 39 ± 19 0.362
 White cell count, 1000/mm3 9.11 ± 4.10 10.98 ± 4.84 0.479
 C-reactive protein, mg/dL 7.2 ± 6.4 6.8 ± 4.4 0.857
 Procalcitonin, ng/mL 1.31 ± 2.40 1.35 ± 1.41 0.628

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

HAP, hospital-acquired pneumonia; VAP, ventilator-associated pneumonia; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; BSI, bloodstream infection; CLABSI, central line-associated bloodstream infection.