INTRODUCTION
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. By 2030, COPD is expected to be the third main cause of death [
1]. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) represents not only a frequent complication but also a deadly cause in patients with COPD [
2,
3]. In a recent article, authors analyzed the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data from 2007 to 2015. Patients with COPD had a higher admission rate than those without COPD and the hospitalization rate due to respiratory illnesses intensified as the grade of COPD advanced from Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 1 to GOLD 4 [
4].
The prevalence of pathogens for pneumonia varies depending on geography, comorbidities, vaccination status, and site of care. Usually, the most commonly identified pathogens of CAP are
Streptococcus pneumoniae and respiratory viruses [
5–
7]. It is important to identify pathogens for pneumonia in the general population and in specific, highrisk groups for decision-making of appropriate antibiotics. Unfortunately, in more than half of cases, pathogens are not detected despite extensive microbiologic testing [
8,
9]. In addition, the distribution of pathogens for CAP changes over time. Especially, the overall incidence of pneumonia due to
S. pneumoniae is declining, in part due to widespread use of pneumococcal vaccination [
6]. Furthermore, serotypes of pneumococcus that cause pneumonia change depending on the coverage of the specific serotypes in pneumococcal vaccine [
10]. In Korea, the cost for pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPV 23) is covered by the National Immunization Program (NIP) since May 2013, which resulted in high vaccination rate among adults. However, pneumococcal protein-conjugated vaccine 13 (PCV 13) is approved but not supported by the NIP, which explains the low rate of PCV13 vaccination among elderly people [
11]. Elderly patients with COPD are one of the most high-risk populations for pneumococcal pneumonia. Introduction of PPV 23 or PCV 13, has delivered a profound impact on causative pathogens for pneumonia in that population. However, to our knowledge, the change in the pathogenic distribution of CAP in patients with COPD, not to mention of serotype specificity of
S. pneumoniae have not been evaluated in the post-era of vaccinations in Korea.
We conducted a prospective, multi-center, cohort study with the collaboration of Korean pulmonologists in seven university-affiliated hospitals. We evaluated the pathogen distribution, influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status, and other clinical characteristics of hospitalized pneumonia patients with COPD. Moreover, we conducted serotype-specific urine antigen detection (SS-UAD) assay for S. pneumoniae.
DISCUSSION
CAP is a frequent complication in COPD and once developed, it can be fatal. Pneumonia has been the third major cause of mortality for more than ten years in Korea [
16]. Comorbidities such as diabetes, chronic heart diseases, cigarette smoking, chronic hepatic diseases, bronchial asthma, and COPD increase the risk for the development of pneumonia [
5]. In fact, when old age (≥ 65 y) is combined with COPD, the risk for pneumococcal pneumonia increases nearly 8-fold [
7]. Additionally, ICSs, which were used by nearly half of participants in the present study, escalcted the risk for pneumonia [
13]. However, the burden of pneumococcal pneumonia and the serotype-specific prevalence of
S. pneumoniae in patient population with COPD in the post-vaccination era have not been specifically evaluated in Korea. Therefore, we conducted a prospective, multi-center study with the collaboration of Korean pulmonologists at seven University-affiliated hospitals to evaluate pathogen distribution, and other clinical characteristics of COPD patients admitted for CAP.
The patients with COPD hospitalized for CAP were predominantly male (95.1%) with old ages (75.55 ± 8.59 y), which was expected because the smoking rate of adult Korean men, although showing a declining trend in recent decade has been high for a long period of time [
17]. Participants had multiple comorbidities, with hypertension and diabetes as the most common conditions, which is consistent with other clinical studies of patients with COPD in Korea [
18]. Most of patients with COPD (89.4%) were classified to either group B or group D and the percent-predicted post-bronchodilator was 55.43 ± 19.71%. In large clinical trials for COPD, patients constituting group B and group D in combination usually occupied the majority of patients [
19]. In accordance with the GOLD guideline, many of participants were using inhaler therapies containing either long-acting beta 2 agonists (73.4%) or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (64.5%) with or without ICSs (
Table 1). The above findings imply that the clinical profile of subjects enrolled in the present study generally represent a real world, standard feature of patients with COPD.
In the severity classification of CAP, patients with PSI class III or more are usual candidates for hospitalization [
20]. This is consistent with our result that 87.1% subjects were classified to PSI class III or more (
Table 2). CURB-65 score was 1.0 [1.0–2.0] for the whole population and there was no difference in CURB-65 score between PCV13 recipients and non-recipients. As for causative pathogens of pneumonia,
P. aeruginosa and
H. influenzae were most frequently isolated organisms from the sputum culture. When sputum culture and SS-UAD assay were combined with the consideration of 4 replicated cases, the prevalence of pneumococcal pneumonia was 9.48%. Pneumococcus usually occupies 20 to 40% of pathogens of CAP [
9,
11]. The reasons for a lower rate of isolation of
S. pneumoniae in the present study could be related to prior, frequent antibiotic exposure before being transferred to University-affiliated hospitals of participating institutes. In the pre-PCV 13 era, 19A/F, 15A/F, 19B, and 23A were frequent serotypes of pneumococcus. Meanwhile 23A, 15A/F, and 3 were the major serotypes in the post-PCV 13 era in Korea [
15]. In the present study of more specified population of COPD, common serotypes were 22F, 6A, and 6B. PPV 23 contains antigens for 22F and 6B and PCV 13 includes antigens for 6A and 6B. The frequent isolation of three serotypes covered either by PPV 23 or by PCV 13 might be explained by the prolonged interval from the time of PPV 23 inoculation to hospitalization (1,982.43 ± 795.43 d) and the low rate of vaccination for PCV 13 (25.8%) (
Fig. 1). The low rate of PCV 13 vaccination is closely related to the reimbursement policy of Korean government for pneumococcal vaccination. As was noted, the costs for influenza and PPV 23 in old ages (≥ 65 y) are fully covered by NIP, but that of PCV 13 is not reimbursed.
A protective effect for mortality has not been demonstrated among recipients of influenza, PPV 23, or PCV 13 in the present study. On the contrary, deceased patients had higher rate of PPV vaccination than survivors (84.6 vs. 51.8%). It is important to note that the duration from PPV 23 vaccination to hospitalization was more than three years in most recipients (87.9%). The effect of PPV 23 vaccination wanes two to three years after inoculation, meaning that almost 90% of PPV 23 recipients in the present study would not have enough IgG titer for pneumococcal infection [
21]. In addition, the interval from the PSV 23 vaccination to the hospitalization was longer for the deceased (n = 8, 21,850 d) than for survivors (n = 132, 1,790), although the difference was not statistically significant due to the small number of deaths. The increased mortality in the PPV 23 vaccination group might be related to the longer duration since vaccination. Dual vaccination with PPV 23 and PCV 13 did not differ in mortality and ICU admission rate compared to PPV 23 alone, PCV 13 alone, or non-vaccination.
There are some limitations in the present study. At first, the sample size was calculated to be 384 in the assumption that there would be a one point difference in CURB-65 score between PCV 13 recipients and non-recipients. After reaching 92.9% of target number (357 patients), we closed enrollment because of SARS-CoV2 pandemic. In addition, it was postulated that 30% of pneumonia would be caused by pneumococcus. In fact, pneumococcus explained only 9.48% of pneumonia, less than one-third of our assumption. Early closure of enrollment and low rate of pneumococcal pneumonia must have weakened the statistical power for the evaluation of vaccination effects. In addition, except for the SS-UAD test which was performed in the central lab, other radiologic and laboratory evaluation were conducted separately at each participating institution. It might have resulted in variation in the tests. Still, the present study provided valuable information regarding serotype-specific prevalence of pneumococcal pneumonia in COPD patients hospitalized for CAP in the post-vaccination era in Korea.
In summary, pneumococcus is an important pathogen for CAP developed in patients with COPD. Three serotypes, 22F, 6A, and 6B, which are covered either by PPV 23 or by PCV 13, still were prevalent serotypes of pneumococcus. The prolonged interval from PPV 23 inoculation and the low vaccination rate for PCV 13 might be plausible explanations for the noted serotypes. Further efforts should be devoted to protecting patients with COPD from preventable pneumococcal infection.